Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd, No. 10–98.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtJustice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.
Citation131 S.Ct. 2074,179 L.Ed.2d 1149,563 U.S. 731
Parties John D. ASHCROFT, Petitioner, v. Abdullah AL–KIDD.
Docket NumberNo. 10–98.
Decision Date31 May 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7899 practice notes
  • v. Brito, Civil Case No. ELH-17-2670
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • November 6, 2018
    ...mistaken judgments about open legal questions.'" Lane v. Franks, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 2369, 2381 (2014) (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 743 (2011)). However, "[b]ecause an official 'who performs an act clearly established to be beyond the scope of his discretionary authority......
  • Ermini v. Scott, Case No: 2:15-cv-701-FtM-99CM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • April 5, 2017
    ...sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would [have understood] that what he is doing violates that right." Ashcroft v. al–Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 179 L.Ed.2d 1149 (2011). Because Fourth Amendment qualified-immunity determinations turn on the reasonableness of an ......
  • Doe v. Univ. of Ala. in Huntsville, Case No.: 5:14-cv-02029-HGD
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • March 31, 2016
    ...sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right.” Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 2083, 179 L.Ed.2d 1149 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). Plaintiff has failed to set out any clearly establish......
  • Tarhuni v. Holder, No. 3:13–cv–00001–BR.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Oregon)
    • March 26, 2014
    ...allegedly violated must have been “ ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct.” Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 2080, 179 L.Ed.2d 1149 (2011). “Qualified immunity gives government officials breathing room to make reasonable but mistaken judgments about ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7821 cases
  • Estate of Bryant v. Balt. Police Dep't, Civil Action No. ELH-19-384
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • February 10, 2020
    ...reasonable but mistaken judgments about open legal questions.'" Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228, 243 (2014) (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 743 (2011)); accord Brawn v. Maynard, 652 F.3d 557, 560 (4th Cir. 2011) (observing that qualified immunity protects government officials from ......
  • Corrigan v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 15-7098
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • November 8, 2016
    ...on point, [so long as] existing precedent ... [has] placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate.” Ashcroft v. a l–Kidd , 563 U.S. 731, 741, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 179 L.Ed.2d 1149 (2011). In assessing a claim of qualified immunity, the facts must be taken “in the light most favor......
  • Easley v. City of Riverside, No. 16-55941
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • May 18, 2018
    ...them from liability when they make reasonable mistakes." Morales v. Fry , 873 F.3d 817, 822 (9th Cir. 2017) ; see Ashcroft v. al-Kidd , 563 U.S. 731, 743, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 179 L.Ed.2d 1149 (2011) ("Qualified immunity gives government officials breathing room to make reasonable but mistaken j......
  • Trujillo v. Rio Arriba Cnty. ex rel. Rio Arriba Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, No. CIV 15-0901 JB/WPL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of New Mexico
    • December 19, 2016
    ...questions of constitutional or statutory interpretation that will 'have no effect on the outcome of the case.'" Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 131 S. Ct. 2074, 2080 (2011)(quoting Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. at 236-37). See Camreta v. Greene, 131 S. Ct. at 2032 ("In general, courts should think har......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
30 books & journal articles
  • Deportation Arrest Warrants.
    • United States
    • February 1, 2021
    ...of a properly issued warrant," which "breaks the causal chain and insulates an initiating party"). (55.) See, e.g., Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731,738-39 (2011) (refusing to give credence to the respondent's argument that the warrant for his arrest was based on "improper motives" because......
  • Rights, Structure, and Remediation: The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 131 Nbr. 7, May 2022
    • May 1, 2022
    ...1862, 1862-64 (2020) (Thomas, )., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (same). (297.) HUQ, supra note 2, at 113; see Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741 (298.) See, e.g., Jessop v. City of Fresno, 936 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 2793 (2020) (describing the police ......
  • Qualified Immunity and Federalism
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal Nbr. 109-2, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...new restrictions on f‌inding civil liability.”8 1. See, e.g., Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982). 2. Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741 (2011) (alteration in original) (quoting Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640 (1987)). 3. Id. at 743 (quoting Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S......
  • RECALIBRATING QUALIFIED IMMUNITY: HOW TANZIN V. TANVIR, TAYLOR V. RIOJAS, AND MCCOY V. ALAMU SIGNAL THE SUPREME COURT'S DISCOMFORT WITH THE DOCTRINE OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.
    • United States
    • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 112 Nbr. 1, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...e.g., Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223,230-33 (2009); Quinn v. Young, 780 F.3d 998, 1004 (10th Cir. 2015) (quoting Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 735 (2011) ("[W]hen this defense is raised, the onus is on the plaintiff to demonstrate '(1) that the official violated a statutory or const......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT