Aspen Park, Inc. v. Bonneville County, 071019 IDSCCI, 45679

Docket Nº:45679
Opinion Judge:BRODY, Justice.
Party Name:ASPEN PARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BONNEVILLE COUNTY, Defendant-Respondent.
Attorney:Hopkins, Roden, Crockett, Hansen & Hoopes, PLLC, Idaho Falls, for appellant. C. Timothy Hopkins argued. Nelson, Hall, Parry, Tucker, PLLC, Idaho Falls, for respondent. Weston S. Davis argued. Michael Kane & Associates, PLLC, Boise, for Idaho Association for Counties, amicus curiae. Brad M. Purdy,...
Judge Panel:Chief Justice BURDICK, and Justices BEVAN, STEGNER, and MOELLER CONCUR.
Case Date:July 10, 2019
Court:Supreme Court of Idaho
 
FREE EXCERPT

ASPEN PARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BONNEVILLE COUNTY, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 45679

Supreme Court of Idaho

July 10, 2019

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of Idaho, Bonneville County. Joel E. Tingey, District Judge.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Hopkins, Roden, Crockett, Hansen & Hoopes, PLLC, Idaho Falls, for appellant. C. Timothy Hopkins argued.

Nelson, Hall, Parry, Tucker, PLLC, Idaho Falls, for respondent. Weston S. Davis argued.

Michael Kane & Associates, PLLC, Boise, for Idaho Association for Counties, amicus curiae.

Brad M. Purdy, Boise, for Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho amicus curiae.

BRODY, Justice.

This case involves the denial of a property tax exemption. Aspen Park, Inc., a nonprofit organization, sought a property tax exemption from Bonneville County for its low-income apartments. The County's Board of Equalization denied an exemption because some of the apartments were leased to tenants with incomes above 60 percent of the county's median income level, a requirement set forth in Idaho Code section 63-602GG(3)(c). Aspen Park appealed to the Idaho Board of Tax Appeals, arguing that the statute allowed vacant apartments to be leased to higher-income earners. After the Board of Tax Appeals denied tax exempt status, Aspen Park filed a petition for judicial review with the district court. The district court granted Bonneville County summary judgment after deciding that to be eligible for a tax exemption under Idaho Code section 63-602GG, every apartment must be rented to low-income individuals or remain vacant. Aspen Park timely appealed. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Aspen Park, Inc., an Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, owns and operates Aspen Park Apartments located in Idaho Falls, Idaho. The apartments consist of 72 units that are meant to be rented to individuals and families whose income is 60 percent or lower than the median income level for Bonneville County.

In 2016, Aspen Park applied for a property tax exemption from Bonneville County under Idaho Code section 63-602GG. Aspen Park's assessed land value was $206, 890 and the improvement value was $1, 261, 020. The Bonneville County Board of Equalization denied Aspen Park's application on multiple grounds, including not meeting the low-income housing property tax exemption requirements found in Idaho Code section 63-602GG. Aspen Park appealed to the Idaho Board of Tax Appeals. The Board affirmed the Board of Equalization's decision denying a property tax exemption. Aspen Park appealed to the district court seeking...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP