AT & T v. City of Atlanta, No. 99-12261
| Decision Date | 26 April 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-12261 |
| Citation | 210 F.3d 1322 |
| Parties | (11th Cir. 2000) AT&T WIRELESS PCS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ATLANTA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
OPINION
Opinion vacated. See September 7, 2000 opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
Verizon North, Inc. v. Strand
...entrant into the telecommunications market, and is not an intended beneficiary of the FTA. Even in AT & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 210 F.3d 1322, 1329-30 (11th Cir.2000), vacated on other grounds, 223 F.3d 1324, 2000 WL 1210663 (11th Cir. Aug.25, 2000), cited by Plaintiff, whe......
-
Omnipoint Communications v. City of White Plains
...that damages are available under the TCA itself. 5. The Eleventh Circuit did address this issue in AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 210 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir.2000). A panel of that Court held that violations of the TCA do support a § 1983 claim. Id. This decision, however, was rece......
-
Qwest Corp. v. City of Santa Fe, New Mexico
...argument that a Section 1983 claim is viable in this context, Qwest cites the Eleventh Circuit's opinion in AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 210 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2000). That opinion, however, was vacated pending rehearing en banc, see AT&T Wireless PCS Inc. v. City of Atlanta......
-
E. Spire Communications Inc. v. Baca
...claim based on deprivations under the Telecommunications Act, relying on the Eleventh Circuit's opinion in AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 210 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir.2000). As the Honorable M. Christina Armijo, United States District Judge, observed almost a year ago in Qwest Corp.......
Request a trial to view additional results