Atchison
Decision Date | 07 March 1885 |
Citation | 6 P. 281,33 Kan. 223 |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Parties | THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY v. C. E. WILSON, as Treasurer of Hodgeman County, et al |
Error from Hodgeman District Court.
ACTION brought by The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company against C. E. Wilson, county treasurer of Hodgeman county, and School District No. 19, of that county, to restrain the collection of certain taxes levied for school purposes, and which are alleged to be illegal.
The plaintiff in its petition averred:
For building purposes, 10 mills
$ 298.77
For teachers' wages, 5 mills
149.38
For library fund, 1/2 mill
14.98
And that said amounts and levy were duly placed upon the tax-rolls of Hodgeman county for the year 1882, and became a charge against the property of this plaintiff.
Upon application of the plaintiff, a temporary injunction was granted by the judge of the district court. Afterward the defendants demurred to the petition of plaintiff, upon the following grounds:
At the April Term, 1884, the cage was tried upon the demurrer of the defendants. The court sustained the demurrer, and dissolved the temporary injunction theretofore granted; and the plaintiff electing to stand upon the demurrer, judgment was rendered against it for costs. These rulings are assigned as error.
Judgment affirmed.
A. A Hurd, M. W. Sutton, and Robert Dunlap, for plaintiff in error; Geo. W. McCrary, general counsel.
W. S Kenyon, and T. S. Haun, for de...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Red River Valley Brick Co. v. City of Grand Forks
... ... 70, 90 N.W. 666; ... People ex rel. Quisenberry v. Ellis, 253 Ill. 369, ... 97 N.E. 697, Ann. Cas. 1913A, 589; 1 Dill. Mun. Corp. 4th ed ... art. 43a; Blackwell v. Newkirk, 31 Okla. 304, 121 P ... 270, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 441; Clement v. Everest, 29 ... Mich. 22; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Wilson, 33 ... Kan. 223, 6 P. 281; Quint v. Hoffman, 103 Cal. 506, ... 37 P. 514, 777; Reclamation Dist. v. Turner, 104 ... Cal. 335, 37 P. 1039; Metcalfe v. Merritt, 14 ... Cal.App. 244, 111 P. 506; People ex rel. Longress v ... Board of Education, 101 Ill ... ...
-
Babcock v. Kansas City
...District No. 1, 184 Kan. 376, 336 P.2d 815, the reason for the foregoing rule was to be well stated in Atchison, T. & S. F. Rld. Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223, at page 228, 6 P. 281, as "It would be dangerous and wrong to permit the existence of municipalities to depend on the result o......
-
Tallmadge v. Walker
... ... 590, 118 P. 71; ... State ex rel. Murdock v. Ryan, 41 Utah 327, 125 P ... 666; Hudson v. Conklin, 77 Kan. 764, 93 P. 585; 28 ... Cyc. 174; State ex rel. Doud v. Council, 106 Iowa ... 731, 77 N.W. 474; State ex rel. Walker v. McLean ... County, 11 N.D. 356, 92 N.W. 385; Atchison, T. & S ... F. R. Co. v. Wilson, 33 Kan. 223, 6 P. 281; School ... Dist. v. Gibbs, 52 Kan. 564, 35 P. 222; State ex rel ... Madderson v. Nohle, 16 N.D. 168, 125 Am. St. Rep. 628, 112 ... N.W. 141 ... The new ... corporation should be made a party to the action, and in ... ...
-
Schulenberg v. City of Reading
...211 P.2d 101, 13 A.L.R.2d 1272); of actions challenging the legality of the organization of school districts (Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Wilson, Treas., 33 Kan. 223, 6 P. 281; Scamahorn v. Perry, 132 Kan. 679, 296 P. 347; Shaffer v. Board of County Comm'rs of Ford County, 133 Kan. 256, ......