Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v. Cochern

Decision Date08 February 1890
Citation23 P. 151,43 Kan. 225
CourtKansas Supreme Court
PartiesTHE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY v. JOEL COCHRAN, as Administrator of the estate of John M. Gibson, deceased

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Error from Johnson District Court.

ON the 31st day of May, 1887, Joel Cochran, administrator of the estate of John M. Gibson, deceased, filed his petition in the district court of Johnson county, against the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, alleging that--

"The plaintiff herein complains of the defendant herein, for that on the 30th day of May, 1887, he was duly appointed and qualified, and letters of administration of the estate of John M. Gibson, deceased, were issued to him by the probate court of Johnson county, state of Kansas, as the administrator of said estate. And plaintiff further states that the defendant herein is now, and was at the date hereinafter first mentioned, a railroad corporation duly organized under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Kansas, and then owned and operated, and now owns and operates, a railroad known as the Atchison, Topeka &amp Santa Fe Railroad Company, and as such corporation and railroad company was then and is now operating and exclusively managing and controlling the Southern Kansas Railway Company, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Kansas; that the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company was then and still is a common carrier of passengers for hire upon its trains into and through Douglas and Johnson counties, Kansas, and that the Southern Kansas Railway Company, so operated, managed and controlled by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, was then and still is a common carrier of passengers for hire upon its trains of cars into and through Johnson county, Kansas, and then ran its trains of cars over and used defendant's tracks from Kansas City, Missouri, to Holliday, Kansas; and that the town or village of Holliday was then a regular station and depot, in Johnson County, Kansas, of the said Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, on the main line of its said railroad; and that said town or village of Holliday, and the city of Olathe, in Johnson county, Kansas were then regular stations or depots on the line of the Southern Kansas Railway. Plaintiff further states, on the 21st day of March, 1887, the plaintiff's intestate, John M. Gibson, had ridden as a passenger on a regular passenger train of cars of the defendant company from Lawrence and Eudora, Kansas, to Holliday station, and that upon that day, at Holliday aforesaid, John M. Gibson, now deceased, purchased from the defendant company's ticket agent at Holliday depot aforesaid a ticket entitling him to be transported on that day as a passenger thence to Olathe, Kansas, by and upon a regular passenger train of cars of (and then used by the defendant in the name) the Southern Kansas Railway Company; and that in order for John M. Gibson, now deceased, to get upon the regular passenger train of cars so then being operated, managed and controlled by the defendant company to be carried from Holliday to Olathe aforesaid, it became and was necessary for John M. Gibson, now deceased, to walk across the interjacent railroad tracks belonging to the defendant company, and then being used by said company and said Southern Kansas Railway Company with their locomotive engines and passenger and freight trains of cars (there being no other way for the decedent to get to and upon said train); and that while the decedent was in the act of walking across the interjacent railroad tracks aforesaid, at the station and upon the invitation of the defendant company, and for the sole purpose of boarding the regular passenger train of cars of the Southern Kansas Railway Company as aforesaid to be carried thence to Olathe aforesaid upon said train of cars, which was then at rest about two or three tracks remote from the platform of the defendant's depot or ticket office, which said Southern Kansas train of cars did not then come to nor did it intend to then come to the platform of the depot, and which train was then about ready to start for Olathe aforesaid, and there then being no regular crossing across the interjacent tracks and no person there to warn him of danger, the defendant company then and there, to wit, on the 21st day of March, 1887, at Holliday aforesaid, carelessly, grossly, negligently, wantonly, and recklessly, by and through its servants and employes then in charge of and operating and running one of its freight trains of cars with a locomotive engine attached thereto and in motion, on one of said interjacent tracks of the defendant company, permitted the locomotive so attached to said freight train of cars last aforesaid (without any warning of any character to the decedent of danger) to run against, strike, come in contact with, and knock down and drag in a violent and forcible manner the said John M. Gibson, now deceased, without any fault, negligence or want of care on the part of the decedent, and that by reason of said locomotive engine so striking him and so knocking him down and dragging him, the decedent was greatly bruised, cut and mangled in and about his head, back, legs, arms and body, internally, and his right leg was broken; and in consequence thereof the decedent became sick, sore, and lame, and in consequence of the injuries so received as aforesaid he was confined to his bed, and suffered much mental and bodily pain and agony, from the said 21st day of March, 1887, until on or about the 30th day of March, 1887, when he died, intestate, at Olathe, Kansas; and that the injuries all and singular so received by him as aforesaid were the cause of the death of John M. Gibson, without any fault, negligence, or want of care on the part of said decedent contributing thereto. Plaintiff further states, that John M. Gibson, now deceased, left Mary A. Cochran (nee Gibson) and Elizabeth J. Adams (nee Gibson) his only children him surviving, and are his only next of kin him surviving; and that by reason of the premises, all and singular, the said Mary E. Cochran and Elizabeth J. Adams, sole surviving children and sole next of kin aforesaid, have been greatly damaged by the death of John M. Gibson, now deceased, in and to the amount of $ 10,000, no part of which hath been paid. Plaintiff therefore as such administrator demands judgment against the defendant company herein for the sum of $ 10,000 so as aforesaid sustained, with costs of suit and equitable relief."

Trial had at the September term of the court for 1887, before the court with a jury. The court among other things charged the jury as follows:

"1. In this case the plaintiff charges the defendant company as being the owner, or operator, controller and manager of the Southern Kansas Railway Company at the time his intestate Gibson, received his alleged injuries, and therefore I charge you that the question of liability and responsibility of the defendant company is one of fact to be determined by you from all the testimony in the case.

"2. In determining the liability of the defendant company, the true test is, what company had the control, direction and management of said Southern Kansas Railway and of the men then operating the engines and passenger trains on said road, and especially the engine and passenger train on which the plaintiff's intestate was endeavoring to take passage, if any; and in determining these questions it is your duty to take into consideration all the facts and circumstances proven by the evidence.

"3. The fact that the officials of one railroad company are officials of another railroad company, standing alone, would not make the one responsible for the negligence or default of the other; neither would the mere fact of the one railroad owning stock or bonds of another railroad company make the former company responsible for the acts of the latter; but if you find from the evidence that the Southern Kansas Railway Company, for all practical purposes, was, at the time alleged, managed, controlled and operated by the defendant company, being used as an auxiliary and a part of the defendant company's system of railroads, then and in that event the defendant company would ordinarily be responsible for the negligence, default or miscarriage of the Southern Kansas Railway Company, its agents and employes.

"4. If in fact the defendant company exercised and assumed the actual control of the management and operation of said Southern Kansas Railway at the time of the alleged injuries, it would be liable for the negligence, if any, of the men in operating and managing the engines and passenger trains of the Southern Kansas Railway Company, in failing to bring its passenger trains to the platform of the depot to receive passengers, (if they did so fail,) even though the men were at the time engaged in the business of another company, namely, the Southern Kansas Railway Company.

"5. If the jury find that the general management of both roads is under the control of the same officials; that the boards of directors of both roads are substantially the same persons that a majority of the said stock of said Southern Kansas Railway Company is owned by the Kansas City, Topeka & Western Railroad Company, which latter company is leased and and operated by said defendant company for its use and benefit, and that the balance of the stock of the said Southern Kansas Railway Company is owned by the defendant company; that both the defendant and the Southern Kansas companies use and occupy the same line of track from Kansas City, Mo., to Holliday, Kansas; that the same person is agent and ticket-seller for both companies at said station, Holliday; that the treasurer of said Southern Kansas Railway...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1894
    ...the Missouri Pacific Railway Company. (Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Missouri P. R. Co., 115 U.S. 596; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Cochran, 43 Kan. 225; Button v. Hoffman, 61 Wis. 20.) The plaintiffs have no standing in a court of equity to seek any relief under the contract with the Fitzger......
  • Trimble v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 13, 1914
    ...85 F. 838; Armour v. Bennetts' Sons, 123 F. 56; Adams v. Railroad, 24 So. 211; Telephone Co. v. Telephone Co., 30 So. 725; Railroad v. Cochran, 43 Kan. 225; v. Bridge Co., 64 A. 909; Ulmer v. Railroad, 57 A. 1001; Bank v. Construction Co., 25 S.E. 326; Railroad v. Ashling, 43 N.E. 373; Foun......
  • ford Hardwood Lumber Company v. Clement
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1911
    ...2 Ch. 323; 9 Lea 694. The owner of all or substantially all of the stock in a corporation is not liable for its debts. 92 F. 735; 43 Kan. 225; 4 A. 404; 10 P. 17; Mich. 87. 8. The damages are excessive. Compensation is limited to such injuries as results of the breach as on the face of the ......
  • Doughty v. CSX Transp., Inc., 72712
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1995
    ...(b). A corporation holding stock in another corporation stands in the same relation as a stockholder. See A.T. & S.F. Rld. Co. v. Cochran, 43 Kan. 225, 234, 23 P. 151 (1890). Both parties agree that FGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of CSXT; FGE is not undercapitalized; and CSXT does not pay......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT