Atchison v. Higgins
Decision Date | 15 December 1899 |
Docket Number | 558 |
Citation | 59 P. 175,9 Kan.App. 672 |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Parties | ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, AND ALDACE F. WALKER et al., Receivers, v. JOHN J. HIGGINS |
Decided December, 1899.
Error from Sedgwick district court; C. REED, judge.
Judgment of district court reversed.
RAILROADS -- Injury to Employee -- Release. The record examined, and held, that the evidence and special findings of the jury show that plaintiff executed a valid agreement releasing the railroad company from all liability for injuries alleged to have been received by him while in its service.
A. A Hurd, W. Littlefield, and F. W. Bentley, for plaintiffs in error.
Adams & Adams, and J. D. Houston, for defendant in error.
John J. Higgins, defendant in error, brought this action against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while in its service as brakeman. Afterward, A. F. Walker, J. J. McCook, and J. C. Wilson, receivers of the railroad, were, by order of the court, made parties defendant with the railroad company.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clark v. Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation
... ... facts known at the time. Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v ... Wilcox, 54 C. C. A. 147, 116 F. 913; Atchison, T. & S ... F. R. Co. v. Bennett, 63 Kan. 781, 66 P. 1018 ... Settlement ... of a claim for injury to person and loss of ... Chicago & A. R ... Co. 116 Ill.App. 277, 214 Ill. 78, 73 N.E. 398; ... Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Higgins, 9 Kan.App ... 672, 59 P. 175; Chicago, R. I. & T. R. Co. v ... Williams, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 198, 83 S.W. 248; ... Rutherford v. Rutherford, ... ...