Atkins v. Bender
| Decision Date | 06 June 1928 |
| Docket Number | No. 1618.,1618. |
| Citation | Atkins v. Bender, 26 F.2d 690 (W.D. La. 1928) |
| Parties | ATKINS v. BENDER, Collector of Internal Revenue. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana |
Wilkinson, Lewis & Wilkinson, of Shreveport, La., for plaintiff.
Philip H. Mecom, U. S. Atty., of Shreveport, La.
This is an action at law to recover from the government the sum of $104,306.59, paid under protest as income and profit taxes for the year 1919.The claim is based, first, upon the contention that the right to collect the taxes, if it ever existed, had been lost by the running of limitations before proceedings were instituted for that purpose; and, secondly, upon the proposition that petitioner did not owe the taxes.The jury has been waived in writing and the matter submitted to the court.
The Facts.
The Caddo Oil & Refining Company was a Louisiana corporation, organized December 9, 1916, with an authorized capital of $10,000,000, of the par value of $100 per share.It acquired certain properties in this state, including a refinery, pipe lines, lands, leases, etc., and issued therefor 99,994 shares, of the total capital of $10,000,000.This stock had a market value of $20 per share.It was not issued direct to the subscribers, but in the name of three individuals, designated as voting trustees, who gave to the stockholders trust receipts in proportion to the stock belonging to each, respectively.
Early in the year 1919 the said Caddo Oil & Refining Company(hereinafter referred to as the Louisiana Company) found itself in need of additional property and funds.It had outstanding first mortgage 6 per cent. bonds, aggregating $2,122,000.A proposition to issue additional stock was considered, but discarded.Negotiations were then opened with certain financial interests in New York and Philadelphia, and on May 2, 1919, there was organized a New York corporation, styled the Caddo Central Oil & Refining Company(hereinafter referred to as the New York Company), with an authorized capital of $15,000,000 consisting of 150,000 shares, also of the par value of $100 each.The incorporators were Thos. F. Thornton, Mortimer Neuman, and Morris Buchter, who each subscribed for 2 shares.Thereupon one Jos. S. Qualey made a proposition to the said New York Company, which was duly accepted, as follows:
Thereafter, pursuant to said agreement, all of the property of the Louisiana Company was conveyed to the New York Company and all of the outstanding stock was likewise transferred to it or its agents.A few of the old stockholders in the Louisiana Company became holders of stock in the new company, but in the main they received bonds for their stock on the basis of $35 per share, face value.
Plaintiff in this case, and her husband, J. B. Atkins, lived under the régime of the community of acquêts and gains of the Louisiana law, which made them...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting