Atkins v. The Nordyke & Marmon Company

Citation6 Kan.App. 145,51 P. 304
Decision Date18 December 1897
Docket Number200
CourtKansas Court of Appeals
PartiesJANE ATKINS et al., Trustees of the Will of Richard Atkins, deceased, v. THE NORDYKE & MARMON COMPANY

December 18, 1897.

Error from Shawnee Circuit Court. Hon. J. B. Johnson, Judge. Affirmed.

Judgment reversed.

S. L Seabrook, for plaintiffs in error.

Rossington Smith & Dallas and Clifford Histed, for defendant in error.

WELLS J. McElroy, J., concurring. MAHAN, P. J. dissenting.

OPINION

WELLS, J.

This case was tried in the court below upon an agreed statement of facts, the substance of which, so far as is necessary to be stated in a review thereof, is as follows:

1. On December 3, 1884, R. J. Heale and Emma Heale, his wife, executed and delivered to Julia Curtis, now Julia Curtis Prall, their promissory note for $ 750, payable five years from date, with interest at the rate of eight per cent. until due, and interest after maturity at the rate of twelve per cent. per annum; and secured sad note by a mortgage upon lot 176 and the east half of lot 174, on Eighth Avenue, in the city of Topeka, Kan. This mortgage was filed in the office of the register of deeds of the county of Shawnee, on December 4, 1884, and duly recorded in book 102, at page 235.

2. On March 20, 1885, R. J. Heale and Emma Heale executed and delivered to W. H. Rossington, trustee, their trust deed upon the premises hereinbefore described, to secure an indebtedness of $ 4,000, payable in installments of $ 1,333.33 on the fifteenth days of August, September, and October, 1885, respectively. This trust deed was duly filed for record in the office of the register of deeds of the county of Shawnee, on April 14, 1885, and recorded in book 100 of deeds and mortgages, on page 379. Said trust deed recited that it was "subject to a mortgage of record, to wit, $ 750, on lot 176 and the east half of lot 174, Topeka, Kan.," which is the same mortgage mentioned in the first paragraph.

3. On or about January 20, 1887, R. J. Heale and Emma Heale obtained a loan of fifteen hundred dollars of John D. Knox & Co., and executed their certain promissory note of that date therefor, securing the same by mortgage upon the lots hereinbefore described, the note being payable three years after the date thereof, with interest at seven per cent. per annum, payable semiannually, on the twentieth days of January and July of each year, for which coupon notes were executed. The mortgage securing this note contained the usual covenants of warranty, and also a condition that, if the interest notes should not be paid when due, the whole of the first note should mature and be due at that time without demand, and said first note should thereafter draw interest at the rate of twelve per cent. per annum. This mortgage was filed for record in the register of deeds' office in said county on January 22, 1887, and recorded in book 112, on page 140. Afterwards, and before maturity, John D. Knox & Co., for a valuable consideration, duly sold and indorsed said first note and each of the said coupon notes to John Atkins, and also assigned in writing and transferred to him the mortgage securing the same, all of which were and are the property of the plaintiffs herein. At the time John D. Knox & Co. took said notes for fifteen hundred dollars and interest, and the mortgage securing the same, they had no actual knowledge of the trust deed in favor of W. H. Rossington, hereinbefore referred to, nor did the said John Atkins, at the time he purchased the said note and mortgage, nor did the plaintiffs, have actual knowledge of said trust deed at the time said note and mortgage came into their possession. Out of the proceeds of said loan for fifteen hundred dollars, John D. Knox & Co., on January 29, 1887, paid to Julia Curtis, now Julia Curtis Prall, the amount then due upon the note and mortgage held by her. The original mortgage was released by the said Julia Curtis, and, together with the notes, was turned over to John D. Knox & Co., and by them afterwards turned over to the plaintiffs herein, before the beginning of this action; but the release was never entered of record. Afterwards, on January 1, 1892, Julia Curtis Prall executed an assignment of said mortgage and the note secured thereby to the plaintiffs herein, and received therefor at the time of the making of said assignment the sum of one dollar.

4. On October 20, 1885, the Nordyke & Marmon Company, being then the owners and holders of the indebtedness secured by the trust deed to W. H. Rossington, hereinbefore mentioned brought suit in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas to foreclose such trust deed. In this suit all parties having an interest in or lien upon said land, of record subsequent to the date of said trust deed, were made parties defendant, and were duly served with chancery subpoena. John D. Knox & Co. and Julia Curtis were not parties to said action and had no actual knowledge of the pendency thereof. A final decree was entered in said cause, in favor of the complainant and against the defendants, on February 14, 1888, and the court found that the Nordyke & Marmon Company had a first lien upon the premises in controversy herein, and ordered the sale thereof if said lien was not paid within six months from that date. The judgment not being paid, a sale was duly had according to law and the order of said court, on October 31, 1888, by the Master in Chancery, and the property was sold to the Nordyke & Marmon Company for the sum of twenty-one hundred dollars. This sale was duly confirmed by the court, and a deed executed for the property, which was filed for record on January 22, 1889, and recorded in book 169, at page 20. This sale was in every respect legally made, and the purchasers thereat are still the owners of said premises and in possession of the same, and have been ever since the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ripey v. Mill
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 16, 1910
    ...the circuit court of Shawnee county to the Kansas Court of Appeals by a petition in error with case-made attached ( Atkins v. Nordyke-Marmon Co., 6 Kan. App. 145, 51 P. 304), where the defendant in error appeared and argued the case without raising the question as to the signing or settling......
  • J.W. Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 16, 1910
    ... ... 436; Horner v ... Christy, 4 Okl. 553, 46 P. 561. However, Atkins et ... al. v. Nordyke-Marmon Company, 60 Kan. 354, 56 P. 533, ... seems ... ...
  • King v. Gleason
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • December 18, 1897

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT