Atlantic Refining Company v. Public Service Commission of the State of New York Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Public Service Commission of the State of New York, 518
| Decision Date | 01 October 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 518,No. 536,518,536 |
| Citation | Atlantic Refining Company v. Public Service Commission of the State of New York Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Public Service Commission of the State of New York, 361 U.S. 801, 80 S.Ct. 42, 4 L.Ed.2d 53 (1958) |
| Parties | The ATLANTIC REFINING COMPANY, Cities Service Production Company, Continental Oil Company, et al., petitioners, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Long Island Lighting Company, et al. TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, petitioner, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Long Island Lighting Company, et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. David K. Kadane and Bertram D. Moll, for respondent-movantLong Island Lighting Co.
Messrs. William C. Braden, Harry S. Littman and Jack Werner, for petitionerTennessee Gas Transmission Co.
The motion of Long...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
36 cases
-
Huron Portland Cement Company v. City of Detroit, Michigan
...Court of Michigan affirmed, 355 Mich. 227, 93 N.W.2d 888. An appeal was lodged here, and we noted probable jurisdiction, 361 U.S. 806, 80 S.Ct. 53, 4 L.Ed.2d 53. In support of the claim that the ordinance cannot constitutionally be applied to appellant's ships, two basic arguments are advan......
-
United States v. Johnson, 18377.
... ... Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division. She was sentenced to three ... showed his presence in Chattanooga in company with a Teamsters Union agent, Charles O'Brien ... would testify truly, did, then and there, state material matters which she did not believe to be ... , agreements, and documents before the Commission, or in obedience to the subpena of the ... ...
-
State v. Laskey
... ... , and that it had been in use without company authorization; that appellant was a former cab ... Waterfront Comm. of New York Harbor (1964), 378 U.S. 52, 84 S.Ct. 1594, 12 ... ...
- State v. Louk
Get Started for Free