AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng
| Docket Number | 19-4067 |
| Decision Date | 27 August 2021 |
AtriCure, an Ohio company, that develops medical devices to treat atrial fibrillation, contracted with Dr. Meng’s company, ZenoMed, to serve as AtriCure’s exclusive Chinese distributor. AtriCure later believed that another of Meng's Chinese companies (Med-Zenith) was attempting to market a dangerous knockoff medical device. AtriCure and ZenoMed had a “Distribution Agreement” that included confidentiality and noncompete clauses and an arbitration clause designating a Chinese entity as the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
20 cases
-
Phillips v. Tangilag
...analysis in the district court did not suffice to preserve the issue for our review on appeal. See AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng , 12 F.4th 516, 530–31 (6th Cir. Aug. 27, 2021).We ...
-
Geomatrix, LLC v. NSF Int'l
...Michigan intermediate decisions to help make this "Erie guess" on the scope of these state-law claims. See, e.g., AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng, 12 F.4th 516, 531 (6th Cir. 2021). But the plain language of these Michigan intermediate decisions shows that they did not interpret the scope of the sta......
-
Firexo, Inc. v. Firexo Grp. Ltd.
...an agreement to arbitrate is actually a specialized forum selection clause."). With this understanding, consider AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng, 12 F.4th 516, 520 (6th Cir. 2021), in which the defendants sought "to enforce a contract's arbitration clause even though they were not parties to, or thi......
-
Hometown Pizza, Inc. v. Hometown Pizza II, LLC
... ... the relevant state law that otherwise governs” rather ... than applying a “pro-arbitration presumption.” ... AtriCure, Inc. v. Meng , 12 F.4th 516, 520 (6th Cir ... 2021) (citing Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle , 556 ... U.S. 624, 630-32 (2009)) ... ...
Get Started for Free