Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Milliken
Decision Date | 01 September 1995 |
Docket Number | Nos. 46,49,s. 46 |
Citation | 704 A.2d 1225,348 Md. 486 |
Parties | ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Herschel D. MILLIKEN. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV), |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, and Raymond A. Hein, Asst. Bar Counsel, for Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, petitioner.
Herschel D. Milliken, Baltimore, for respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER and WILNER, JJ., and KARWACKI, J. (retired, Specially Assigned).
Acting through Bar Counsel, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed two petitions for disciplinary action against Herschel D. Milliken for violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. On February 14, 1996, this Court consolidated the two petitions. We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9 (b) 1 to Judge Carol E. Smith of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. Following an evidentiary hearing and oral argument involving ten separate complaints, Judge Smith found evidence sufficient to sustain nine of the ten complaints. Judge Smith found that Milliken had repeatedly violated Rules 1.1, 2 1.3, 3 1.4, 4 1.15(a), (b), 5 1.16(d), 6 3.2, 7 5.3(b), 8 5.4(a), 9 8.1, 10 8.4, 11 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, and Maryland Rules BU7(a) 12 and BU9. 13 We set forth those findings and conclusions as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sheinbein
...Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCoy, 349 Md. 420, 708 A.2d 681 (1998) (inadequate representation of client); Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Milliken, 348 Md. 486, 704 A.2d 1225 (1998) (gross neglect of client cases, commingling of funds); Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hollis, 347 Md. 547, 702 A......
-
Attorney Grievance v. Thompson
...conduct." Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Briscoe, 357 Md. 554, 568, 745 A.2d 1037, 1044 (2000) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Milliken, 348 Md. 486, 519, 704 A.2d 1225, 1241 (1998)). In order to accomplish our goal to protect the public and to deter other lawyers from engaging in simil......
-
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Weiss
...e.g., Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Bernstein, 363 Md. 208, 229, 768 A.2d 607, 618 (2001); Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Milliken, 348 Md. 486, 519, 704 A.2d 1225, 1241 (1998); Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Williams, 335 Md. 458, 474, 644 A.2d 490, 497 (1994); Attorney Grievance Co......
-
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Barneys
...violations involving the mishandling of clients' funds alone warrant[ed] disbarment," Id. (citing Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Milliken, 348 Md. 486, 519, 704 A.2d 1225, 1241 (1998) (citation omitted)), we also found that "commingling and conversion of client funds, in the absence of mitiga......