Attorney Grievance v. Link
Decision Date | 19 March 2004 |
Docket Number | Misc. Docket AG No. 97 |
Citation | 844 A.2d 1197,380 Md. 405 |
Parties | ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Harold S. LINK, Jr. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and Glenn M. Grossman, Deputy Bar Counsel for Atty. Grievance Com'n of MD, Petitioner.
Harold S. Link, Jr., Cockeysville, for Respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, and JOHN C. ELDRIDGE (retired, specially assigned), JJ.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751,1 approved the filing by Bar Counsel of a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action charging the respondent, Harold S. Link, Jr., with violating Rule 4.4, Respect for Rights of Third Persons,2 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct ("MRPC"), as adopted by Maryland rule 16-812 and, in so doing, acting in a manner prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of MRPC 8.4(d).3 We referred the case to the Honorable Robert E. Cadigan, of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, for hearing, Rule 16-752(a),4 and to find facts and draw conclusions of law. See 16-757(c).5
Following the hearing, at which the complainant, Wilbert Myles, the complainant's supervisor and the respondent, both for himself and in the petitioner's case, all testified, the hearing court concluded that the respondent violated the rules charged. Those conclusions were based on the findings of fact made by the court, after summarizing the testimony, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Rheinstein
...the legal process." Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Payer, 425 Md. 78, 96, 38 A.3d 378, 388 (2012) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Link, 380 Md. 405, 425, 844 A.2d 1197, 1209 (2004)). An attorney may violate Rule 4.4 when he or she includes individuals in a lawsuit without substantial ju......
-
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Rheinstein
...legal process." Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Payer , 425 Md. 78, 96, 38 A.3d 378, 388 (2012) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Link , 380 Md. 405, 425, 844 A.2d 1197, 1209 (2004) ). An attorney may violate Rule 4.4 when he or she includes individuals in a lawsuit without substantial jus......
-
Duvall v. State
...358 Md. at 48, 746 A.2d at 404. Lawyers are officers of the court and should be treated as such. See Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Link, 380 Md. 405, 427, 844 A.2d 1197, 1211 (2004). If the administrative judge questioned defense counsel's credibility or motives in requesting the motion to c......
-
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Joseph, Misc. Docket AG No. 11
...findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence. Theriault, 390 Md. at 209, 888 A.2d at 296; Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Link, 380 Md. 405, 420, 844 A.2d 1197, 1206 (2004); Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Davis, 375 Md. 131, 157–58, 825 A.2d 430, 445–46 (2003). There was clear and con......
-
Blessed Are the Peacemakers: the Case for Civility in the Practice of Law
...with the interests of the client."). [40] Pillars, "With respect to Courts," Rule 1. [41] Attorney Grievance Comn of Maryland v. Link, 380 Md. 405, 844 A.2d 1197, 1199 (2004), citing In the Matter of McAlevy, 69 N.J. 349, 354 A.2d 289, 290-91 (1976). [42] KRPC, Preamble, ¶ [5]. [43] Pillars......
-
"blessed Are the Peacemakers:" [1] the Case for Civility in the Practice of Law
...with the interests of the client.”). [40] Pillars, “With respect to Courts,” Rule 1. [41] Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Link, 380 Md. 405, 844 A.2d 1197, 1199 (2004), citing In the Matter of McAlevy, 69 N.J. 349, 354 A.2d 289, 290-91 (1976). [42] KRPC, Preamble, ¶ [5]. [43] Pillar......
-
Formal Opinion No. 98—ethical Responsibilities of Lawyers Who Engage in Other Businesses, Adopted
...argument that judge was biased against lawyer in lawyer's sixth appeal in his own divorce case). See Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Link, 844 A.2d 1197, 1211-12 (Md. 2004) ("Only when such purely private conduct is criminal or so egregious as to make the harm, or potential harm, flowing from ......