Atwood v. Holland, 439
| Decision Date | 06 July 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 439,439 |
| Citation | Atwood v. Holland, 148 S.E.2d 851, 267 N.C. 722 (N.C. 1966) |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Brenda ATWOOD, a Minor, by Her Next Friend James M. Hayes, Jr. v. Ronnie Scott HOLLAND. |
Hatfield & Allman, by Roy G. Hall, Jr., Winston-Salem, for plaintiffappellant.
Deal, Hutchins & Minor, by John M. Minor and Richard Tyndall, Winston-Salem, for defendantappellee.
Plaintiff assigns as error the entry of the judgment of compulsory nonsuit and a dismissal of the action entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence.
Defendant states in his brief:
Brenda Atwood testified in her behalf in substance, except when quoted, as follows: On 9 February 1964she was 17 years old.About 9 p.m. on Saturday, 9 February 1964, defendant driving his automobile with a man in it came to where she was living at 106 North Sunset Drive in the city of Winston-Salem, and she left with him in his automobile to join some friends at The Gaslight, where they sell tap beer and pizzas and have a jukebox and dance.The Gaslight is on Fourth Street in Winston-Salem right across from Sears.When they arrived at The Gaslight, she, defendant, and the man with defendant went inside where defendant had a table reserved, and the three of them took a seat at the reserved table.Mary and Nancy Hall, friends of theirs, were seated at a table next to their table.She ordered and drank a small Budweiser beer in a can, and defendant ordered and drank a yard-long beer in a big, long glass.A yard-long beer in a glass is equal to three 12-ounce cans of beer.They danced.She ordered and drank another small Budweiser beer, and did not drink any more after that.Defendant drank three or four more yard-long beers.The man who came to her house with defendant and had been at their table left.Christine Young and a man with her joined them at their table.Christine Young and the man with her were drinking whisky, and Christine Young was drunk.Between 11:00 and 11:30 p.m. she and Christine Young left The Gaslight in defendant's automobile, with defendant driving.Defendant drove his automobile to Mary Hall's place on Academy Street.Mary Hall had company, and they did not go in.Defendant's driving from The Gaslight to Mary Hall's place 'was fine, his driving was all right.'Bennie Benefield got in defendant's automobile with them on Academy Street, which made four people in the automobile.Defendant then drove his automobile to Fourteenth Street, where defendant and Benfield got out, went upstairs in a house, and got two pints of whisky.Defendant's driving from Academy Street to Fourteenth Street was all right.Defendant drove from Fourteenth Street to Liberty Street, and went up it towards the airport.She told defendantshe wanted to go home, because they were getting ready to open the bottles of whisky.At that time they were on Liberty Street at Lowe's Hardware.Defendant stopped his automobile there to turn around.Defendant got mad, accused her of having a late date at her home, said he would take her home, mashed his gas pedal all the way to the floor, and 'took off' back up Liberty Street.She told him to slow down, but he did not until he got almost to the curve on Liberty Street.Defendant went into the curve sliding, and at that time 'he was going about 75 or 80, I guess.'When defendant started sliding on the right side of the street, she saw the headlights of an approaching automobile, which was right in front of The Ponderosa Pine.Then defendant cut back across the road, and his automobile hit a pole.She was knocked unconscious.Defendant's driving was at a normal rate of speed and fine before he got mad and pushed his gas pedal to the floor.During the trial it was stipulated that the speed limit at the time and place of the wreck was 35 miles an hour.
Defendant was driving his Chevrolet Corvette.Brenda Atwood testified on cross-examination: She testified on recross-examination:
W. L. Brendle, a police officer in Winston-Salem, about 1:00 a.m. on Sunday, was called to the scene of an accident on Liberty Street.He testified as a witness for plaintiff in substance, except when quoted, as follows: At the scene of the accident he found a 1962 Chevrolet Corvette had skidded into a light pole.He determined from his investigation that defendant was the owner and driver of the vehicle and that Bennie Benfield, Christine Young, and Brenda Atwood were passengers in his automobile.He testified as follows: At the City Hospitalhe talked to defendant, who was bleeding pretty badly about the mouth, and his legs or ankles were messed up so he could not walk.In talking to defendant at the hospital, he could not tell what his condition was with reference to being intoxicated, though he could smell the odor of some type of alcohol on his breath.
D. T. Poplin, a policeman in the city of Winston-Salem, was working off duty at The Ponderosa Pine.This place closed about 12:15 and he and the owner were inside.The owner said he would pay him at 1:00 a.m.He was...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Goepfert v. Filler
...passengers have a duty of care for their own safety. Glandon v. Fiala, 261 Iowa 750, 156 N.W.2d 327, 331 (1968); Atwood v. Holland, 267 N.C. 722, 148 S.E.2d 851, 854 (N.C.1966)("A gratuitous passenger in an automobile is required to use that care for his own safety that a reasonably prudent......
-
Bigelow v. Johnson
...as a matter of law. It is well established that a motor vehicle passenger must exercise due care for his own safety. Atwood v. Holland, 267 N.C. 722, 148 S.E.2d 851 (1966); Dinkins v. Carlton, 255 N.C. 137, 120 S.E.2d 543 (1961); Sorell v. Moore, 251 N.C. 852, 112 S.E.2d 254 (1960). A passe......
-
Bowen v. Gardner, 35
...from plaintiff's evidence, nonsuit on the basis of contributory negligence as a matter of law should be denied. Atwood v. Holland, 267 N.C. 722, 148 S.E.2d 851. See 6 N.C. Index 2d, Negligence, Sec. Plaintiff's evidence in its light most favorable to her, when subjected to these rules, woul......
-
Jernigan v. Atlantic Coastline R. Co.
...so clearly establishes the defense of contributory negligence that no other conclusion can reasonably be drawn.' Atwood v. Holland, 267 N.C. 722, 148 S.E.2d 851. 'Nonsuit on the issue of contributory negligence should be denied when the relevant facts are in dispute or opposite inferences a......