Aubuchon v. Lory

Decision Date31 March 1856
CitationAubuchon v. Lory, 23 Mo. 99 (Mo. 1856)
PartiesAUBUCHON, Appellant, v. LORY, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. An action can not be maintained by an executor or administrator as such to recover damages for trespass upon realty belonging to the estate of the testator or intestate. The action should be brought in the name of the heir or devisee.

Appeal from St. Louis Land Court.

This was a suit originally commenced before a justice of the peace. The plaintiff, Cecille Aubuchon, styled herself in her complaint “Administratrix of the estate of G. Aubuchon, deceased,” and complained that defendant Lory, “did take and move fence off the lands belonging to the estate of the said G. Aubuchon, deceased.” In the summons issued by the justice, plaintiff is styled ““executrix.” The defendant pleaded title in himself, whereupon the cause was removed to the Land Court. In the Land Court, a motion to dismiss the suit was made on the ground that plaintiff could not, as executrix, sue for damages to the realty. On the hearing of this motion, although plaintiff, orally by attorney, alleged title in her individual right, the court sustained the motion and dismissed the suit, whereupon the plaintiff appealed.

A. J. P. Garesché, for appellant.

S. H. Gardner, for respondent.

LEONARD, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff, as executrix, instituted an action in a justice's court for an alleged trespass upon her testator's land, committed since his decease, which, on a plea of title, was...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
55 cases
  • Boatmen's Nat. Bank v. Fledderman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1944
    ...been proper parties plaintiff; but they were not necessary parties plaintiff to quieting the title to this real estate. See also Aubuchon v. Lory, 23 Mo. 99; Chambers v. Wright, 40 Mo. 483, 485; McQuitty v. Wilhite, 218 Mo. 586, 593, 117 S.W. 730, 732, 131 Am. St. Rep. 561; Spicer v. Spicer......
  • Boatmen's Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. Rogers
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1944
    ...been proper parties plaintiff; but they were not necessary parties plaintiff to quieting the title to this real estate. See also Aubuchon v. Lory, 23 Mo. 99; Chambers v. Wright, 40 Mo. 483, 485; McQuitty Wilhite, 218 Mo. 586, 593, 117 S.W. 730, 732, 131 Am. St. Rep. 561; Spicer v. Spicer, 2......
  • Stevens v. Larwill
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 1904
    ...or any part thereof, either directly or to anyone executor or otherwise, as trustee for others, and in nowise refers to them. Aubuchon v. Lary, 23 Mo. 99; Chambers v. Wright's Heirs, 40 Mo. Thorp v. Miller, 137 Mo. 239; Estes v. Nell, 140 Mo. 654; Eneberg v. Carter, 98 Mo. 651; 11 Am. and E......
  • Estes v. Nell
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1897
    ...estate. The administrator did not acquire title to the land by the will, but only the power of disposition for the benefit of the estate. Aubuchon Lory and Chambers' Adm'r v. Wright's Heirs, supra. Under such circumstances it can not be seriously contended that any sale of the lands by Musi......
  • Get Started for Free