Aubuchon v. State of Missouri
| Decision Date | 08 October 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-1314,80-1314 |
| Citation | 631 F.2d 581 |
| Parties | Lois Cleon Shelton AUBUCHON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Lois Cleon Shelton Aubuchon, pro se.
John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., J. Michael Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo., for appellee.
Before ROSS, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.
Lois Aubuchon appeals pro se the dismissal of her § 1983 action against the State of Missouri. Aubuchon sought relief and damages from a 1975 state court judgment which she alleges violated her constitutional rights. The state court proceeding involved the probate of her father's estate. During that proceeding a third party successfully challenged the validity of the marriage of Aubuchon's parents. The Circuit Court of Dent County held that Aubuchon failed to establish the existence of a valid common law marriage between her parents and could not inherit under her father's will.
We affirm the judgment of the district court 487 F.Supp. 529 dismissing Aubuchon's complaint without prejudice to any remedies available to her under state law.
Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is directed at individuals acting under color of state law, not individual states. The State of Missouri is not a proper party to an action brought under § 1983. Milton v. Nelson, 527 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1976); Neal v. Georgia, 469 F.2d 446, 448 (5th Cir. 1972); Meyer v. New Jersey, 460 F.2d 1252, 1253 (3d Cir. 1972); Collins v. Florida, 432 F.2d 60, 61 n.5 (5th Cir. 1970); Stewart v. Minnick, 409 F.2d 826 (9th Cir. 1969). It appears that the only individual Aubuchon could have named as a party in this action was the state court judge, who is protected by the doctrine of judicial immunity. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978).
Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the action by the district court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
...Court of Appeals, 787 F.2d 427, 429 (CA8), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 851, 107 S.Ct. 179, 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986); Aubuchon v. Missouri, 631 F.2d 581, 582 (CA8 1980) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915, 101 S.Ct. 1358, 67 L.Ed.2d 341 (1981); State v. Green, 633 P.2d 1381, 1382 (Alaska 1981)......
-
Madewell v. Downs
...in regard to the seized currency. The Missouri State Highway Patrol is not subject to suit under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Aubuchon v. Missouri, 631 F.2d 581, 582 (8th Cir.1980). Based upon the cases of United States v. $12,390.00, 956 F.2d 801 (8th Cir.1992) and Conrod v. Missouri State Highway......
-
Lowery v. Department of Corrections
...... in a series of assaults by unknown guards and inmates while plaintiff was incarcerated at the State Prison of Southern Michigan. His first amended complaint set forth the following eight causes of .... 3 Some courts have based their holdings on alternative grounds. In Aubuchon v. Missouri, 631 F.2d 581 (C.A.8, 1980), cert. den. 450 U.S. 915, 101 S.Ct. 1358, 67 L.Ed.2d 341 ......
-
Muza v. Missouri Dept. of Social Services
...than res judicata. A state is not a "person" under the Civil Rights Act and may not be sued directly under § 1983. Aubuchon v. Missouri, 631 F.2d 581, 582[1, 2] (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915, 101 S.Ct. 1358, 67 L.Ed.2d 341 (1981). Nor are agencies, such as the Department of Soc......