Auclair v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 04 March 1986 |
| Citation | 505 A.2d 431 |
| Parties | Steven AUCLAIR and Robert Plasse v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. 85-161-Appeal. |
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
This case came before a hearing panel of this court for oral agrument on February 18, 1986 pursuant to an order which had directed both the plaintiffs and the defendant to show cause why this case should not be summarily decided.
After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court was correct in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. The granting of summary judgment was correct, since there is no duty on the part of an insurance carrier for a third party to settle promptly with a claimant. The relationship between the claimant and the insurance carrier for a third party alleged to be liable is an adversary relationship giving rise to no fiduciary obligation on the part of such insurance carrier to the claimant. Any obligation to deal with settlement offers in good faith runs only to the insured, see Bean v. Allstate Ins. Co., 285 Md. 572, 403 A.2d 793 (1979) and cases cited therein.
For the reasons stated, the plaintiffs' appeal is denied and dismissed. The summary judgment entered in the Superior Court is affirmed.
The papers in the case may be remanded to the Superior Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brown v. Candelora
...Corp. of America, 537 P.2d 349 (Okla.App.1975); Pringle v. Robertson, 258 Or. 389, 483 P.2d 814 (1971); Auclair v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 505 A.2d 431 (R.I.1986); Whittington v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 263 S.C. 141, 208 S.E.2d 529 (1974); Dillingham v. Tri-State Insurance......
-
Elmore v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...or privity of contract existing between the insurer and a person injured by one of its policyholders."); Auclair v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 505 A.2d 431 (R.I. 1986) ("The relationship between the claimant and the insurance carrier for a third party alleged to be liable is an adversary rel......
-
Pixton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. of Bloomington, Illinois
...third-party claimants cannot bring bad faith action against insurer as they are strangers to the contract); Auclair v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 505 A.2d 431 (R.I.1986) (no duty or fiduciary obligation running from insurer to third-party claimant); Kranzush v. Badger State Mut. Casualty Co.......
-
Messina v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., s. 91-7175
...255, 258-59 (Iowa 1991); O.K. Lumber Co. v. Providence Washington Ins. Co., 759 P.2d 523, 525-26 (Alaska 1988); Auclair v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 505 A.2d 431, 431 (R.I.1986); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Amick, 680 P.2d 362, 364-65 (Okla.1984); Kranzush, 307 N.W.2d at 259-65; Linscott v. State ......