Augeri v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of City of Middletown

Decision Date11 April 1991
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesE. Janice AUGERI v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the CITY OF MIDDLETOWN et al.

Gerald L. Garlick, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Trina A. Solecki, City Atty., and John H. Hanks, Middletown, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn.App. 172, 586 A.2d 635, is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Kobyluck v. Planning and Zoning Commission
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • July 27, 2004
    ...657, 664-65, 707 A.2d 281 (1998). 9. In Augeri v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 24 Conn. App. 172, 586 A.2d 635, cert. denied, 218 Conn. 904, 588 A.2d 1381 (1991), we affirmed the decision of the trial court. In that appeal, however, we neither were presented with nor decided a claim concer......
  • Robaczynski v. Robaczynski, AC 36030
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 23, 2014
    ...court cannot review a nonexistent ruling." Augeri v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 24 Conn. App. 172, 179, 586 A.2d 635, cert. denied, 218 Conn. 904, 588 A.2d 1381 (1991). Therefore, we will not review this claim. 2. Although the divorce decree did not order the parties to pay half of the p......
  • Isenburg v. Isenburg
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2017
    ...& Zoning Commission , 24 Conn. App. 172, 179, 586 A.2d 635 ("this court cannot review a nonexistent ruling"), cert. denied, 218 Conn. 904, 588 A.2d 1381 (1991).Against this background, to the extent that the plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty claim was raised and decided by the trial cour......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT