Austin v. Alabama Check Cashers Ass'n, 1011907.
Decision Date | 18 November 2005 |
Docket Number | 1011907.,1011930. |
Citation | 936 So.2d 1014 |
Parties | Karen AUSTIN et al. v. ALABAMA CHECK CASHERS ASSOCIATION et al. State Banking Department v. Alabama Check Cashers Association et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
J. Michael Rediker and Michael C. Skotnicki of Haskell Slaughter Young & Rediker, LLC, Birmingham; Lange Clark, Birmingham; Joseph Espy III of Melton Espy Williams & Hayes, Montgomery; Daniel B. Banks, Jr., of Morris, Conchin, Banks & Cooper, Huntsville; Richard Fisher, Cleveland, Tennessee; and Jack L. Block of Sachnoff & Weaver, Ltd., Chicago, Illinois, for appellants Karen Austin et al.
William H. Pryor, Jr., and Troy King, attys. gen., and V. Lynne Windham, asst. atty. gen., and assoc. counsel, Alabama State Banking Department, for appellant State Banking Department.
Louis E. Braswell of Hand Arendall, L.L.C., Mobile, for appellee Speedee Cash of Alabama, Inc.
Paul A. Clark of Hill, Hill, Carter, Franco, Cole & Black, P.C., Montgomery, for appellee Sprague Enterprises, Inc.
Walter R. Byars and B. Saxon Main of Steiner, Crum & Baker, Montgomery, for appellees Alternative Financial Solutions, LLC, and Money Service Centers, LLC.
George W. Walker III and Shannon L. Holliday of Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A., Montgomery, for appellee Express Check Services, Inc.
Steven P. Gregory of Dice & Gregory, L.L.C., Tuscaloosa, for amicus curiae Alabama Arise, in support of the appellants.
Russell Jackson Drake of Whatley Drake, L.L.C., Birmingham; and Deborah M. Zuckerman and Stacy J. Canan of AARP Foundation, Washington, D.C., for amici curiae AARP, National Consumer Law Center, and Consumer Federation of America in support of the appellant, State Banking Department.
Paul Chessin, asst. atty. gen., Colorado Attorney General's Office, Denver, Colorado, for amici curiae Attorneys General and National Association of Consumer Credit Administrators in support of the appellant State Banking Department.
A.H. Gaede, Jr., of Bradley Arant Rose & White, LLP, Birmingham, for amicus curiae Alabama Appleseed Center for Justice, Inc., in support of the appellant, State Banking Department.
J. Paul Compton, Jr., Laurence D. Vinson, Jr., Lesley Smith DeRamus, and Lisa B. Moss, of Bradley Arant Rose & White, LLP, Birmingham, for amicus curiae Alabama Consumer Finance Association, in support of the appellant, State Banking Department.
These consolidated appeals arise out of the State Banking Department's regulation of deferred-presentment transactions, more commonly referred to as "payday loans" because the maturity date of these short-term "loans" generally coincides with the borrower's next payday. The questions presented are whether the Alabama Small Loan Act, § 5-18-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, applies to deferred-presentment transactions, and, whether the trial court erred in holding that deferred-presentment transactions conducted in accordance with its consent order "shall be considered lawful."
On July 1, 1998, the supervisor of the Bureau of Loans at the State Banking Department began issuing cease and desist orders against businesses offering "loans" in the amount of $749 or less without a license. The orders were issued pursuant to the Alabama Small Loan Act. That same day, the Alabama Check Cashers Association ("ACCA"), along with individually named check cashers, instituted a declaratory-judgment action against the Banking Department and individually named employees of the Banking Department. In that action, the ACCA and the check cashers sought a judgment declaring that the Alabama Small Loan Act did not apply to the operations of the check cashers. The ACCA and the check cashers also sought a temporary injunction to prevent the Banking Department from enforcing the cease and desist orders.
The ACCA and the check cashers described their transactions in their complaint as follows:
On October 9, 1998, the trial court entered a consent order, encompassing an agreement between the ACCA and the check cashers, on the one hand, and the Banking Department, on the other. The order provided:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Haynes v. Neshewat
...I might add, that includes the "textualist" approach to which he so avidly subscribes. 3. See, e.g., Alabama: Austin v. Alabama Check Cashers Ass'n, 936 So.2d 1014, 1026 (Ala, 2005). Alaska: DH Blattner & Sons v. NM Rothschild & Sons, Ltd., 55 P.3d 37, 47 (Alaska, 2002). Arizona: Special Fu......
-
F.S. v. D.D. (Ex parte R.D.)
...for judicial construction and the clearly expressed intent of the legislature must be given effect." ’ " Austin v. Alabama Check Cashers Ass'n, 936 So. 2d 1014, 1026 (Ala. 2005) (quoting Ex parte Master Boat Builders, Inc., 779 So. 2d 192, 196 (Ala. 2000), quoting in turn IMED Corp. v. Syst......
-
Thompson v. Titlemax of Ala., Inc.
...the principal amount , per month, advanced in the pawn transaction." Ala Code § 5-19A-7(a) (emphasis added); Austin v. Ala. Check Cashers Ass'n , 936 So. 2d 1014, 1023 (Ala. 2005). Section 5-19A-7(b), in turn, reads: "Any interest, charge, or fees contracted for or received, directly or ind......
-
Martin v. Cash Express Inc.
...Alabama Small Loan Act, § 5–18–1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, or other provisions of Title 5 of Ala.Code 1975. See Austin v. Alabama Check Cashers Ass'n, 936 So.2d 1014 (Ala.2005). On November 22, 2005, after this Court released its decision in Austin, the Martins' counsel, by letter, requested ......