Austin v. Clark

Docket NumberS13G1590
Decision Date10 March 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
76 cases
  • TMX Fin., LLC v. Goldsmith
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 12, 2019
    ...doubts regarding such pleadings must be resolved in the filing party's favor.(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Austin v. Clark , 294 Ga. 773, 774-775, 755 S.E.2d 796 (2014). See OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6). The same standard applies to a motion for judgment on the pleadings, where, as here, "t......
  • U-Haul Co. of Ariz. v. Rutland
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 22, 2019
    ...will sustain a grant of relief to the plaintiff, the complaint is sufficient.(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Austin v. Clark , 294 Ga. 773, 774-775, 755 S.E.2d 796 (2014). We review de novo a trial court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss. Walker Co. v. Tri-State Crematory , 292 Ga. App. ......
  • Norman v. Xytex Corp.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 28, 2020
    ...423.4 In reviewing such a motion, any doubts regarding the complaint must be construed in favor of the plaintiff. Austin v. Clark , 294 Ga. 773, 775, 755 S.E.2d 796 (2014). "To state a claim sounding in tort upon which relief may be granted, a complaint must identify (1) a legal duty the de......
  • Mbigi v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 22, 2016
    ...will sustain a grant of relief to the plaintiff, the complaint is sufficient.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Austin v. Clark, 294 Ga. 773, 775, 755 S.E.2d 796 (2014). On appeal, this Court “review[s] de novo a trial court's determination that a pleading fails to state a claim upon whi......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Initial Pleading
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Proof of Conspiracy Under Federal Antitrust Laws. Second Edition
    • December 8, 2018
    ...the substantive law that drives what facts must be pled.” 128 requirements of their own analogs to Federal Rule 8.”); Aust in v. Clark, 755 S.E.2d 796, 799-800 (Ga. 2014) (reversing the dismissal of a complaint when it was not certain that the plaintiff “would not be entitled to relief unde......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Proof of Conspiracy Under Federal Antitrust Laws. Second Edition
    • December 8, 2018
    ...Cir. 2012), 144 Auraria Student Hous. at the Regency v. Campus Vill. Apartments, 843 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2016), 158 Austin v. Clark, 755 S.E.2d 796 (Ga. 2014), 199 , 270 Austin v. McNamara, 731 F. Supp. 934 (C.D. Cal. 1990), aff’d , 979 F.2d 728 (9th Cir. 1992), 155 308 Proof of Conspiracy......
  • Local Government
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 74-1, September 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...359 Ga. App. at 823-24, 860 S.E.2d at 115.66. Id. at 826, 860 S.E.2d at 117.67. Id. at 827-28, 860 S.E.2d at 118 (quoting Austin v. Clark, 294 Ga. 773, 775, 755 S.E.2d 796, 798-99 (2014)).68. Parr, 359 Ga. App. at 826-27, 860 S.E.2d at 117. 69. O.C.G.A. § 36-33-5 (2022).70. O.C.G.A. § 36-11......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT