Avant Capital Partners, LLC v. W108 Dev. LLC
Decision Date | 30 June 2016 |
Docket Number | 16 Civ. 3359 (LLS) |
Citation | 387 F.Supp.3d 320 |
Parties | AVANT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff v. W108 DEVELOPMENT LLC and Orly Gilat, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Norwick, Schad & Goering, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.
This memorandum addresses points which are somewhat esoteric, but important because they affect the presence or absence of diversity jurisdiction: the difference between "citizens" and "residents." Diversity jurisdiction depends on different citizenship, and on the citizenship of each member of a limited liability company.
Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution gives the federal courts jurisdiction to controversies "between Citizens of different States" (not residents), a distinction which is echoed in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) granting district courts original jurisdiction of all civil actions where more than $75,000 is in controversy, between "citizens of different states." Residences matter only if they assist in establishing domicile and citizenship. These are technical jurisdictional pleading requirements that are not widely known, but must be observed because regardless of their places of residence, the consequence of a party (which includes any member of a limited liability company) whose citizenship is the same as any adversary's is a lack of diversity jurisdiction, and the court simply has no power to hear the case.
The complaint relies upon this court's diversity jurisdiction:
Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship among the parties. The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of costs. This Court thus has original subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Compl. ¶ 5.
For the reasons that follow, the complaint does not adequately allege the existence of diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, plaintiffs are directed to file, on or before July 22, 2016 affidavits or an amended complaint adequately establishing the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction.
28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) provides that district courts shall have jurisdiction over cases involving over $75,000 between "citizens of different states."
Plaintiff Avant and defendant W108 are limited liability companies. Compl. ¶¶ 2, 4. A limited liability company takes the citizenship of its members. Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Aladdin Capital Mgmt. LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d Cir.2012) (); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir.1998) (). "A complaint premised upon diversity of citizenship must allege the citizenship of natural persons who are members of a limited liability company and the place of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entities who are members of the limited liability company." New Millennium Capital Partners, III, LLC v. Juniper Grp. Inc., No. 10 Civ. 46 (PKC), 2010 WL 1257325, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2010), citing Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51–52 (2d Cir.2000) ( ).
The complaint gives the principal places of business of these limited liability companies, and whether their members reside in Connecticut:
Compl. ¶¶ 2, 4.
But "The allegations of the residences of the individuals—and there is not even that as to one of them—are not equivalent to allegations of citizenship and therefore are insufficient." Krause v. Forex Exch. Mkt., Inc., 356 F.Supp.2d 332, 336 (S.D.N.Y.2005).
Furthermore, if either of the LLC-parties have members which are LLC's, the citizenship of the members of those LLC's must also be given, and must be diverse: "Consequently, an LLC's jurisdictional statement must identify the citizenship of each of its members as of the date the complaint or notice of removal was filed, and, if those members have members, the citizenship of those members as well." Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Broidy v. Glob. Risk Advisors LLC
...not alleged the membership of all LLC Defendants, diversity jurisdiction is not appropriate here. See Avant Capital Partners, LLC v. W108 Dev. LLC, 387 F. Supp. 3d 320, 322 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) ("A limited liability company takes the citizenship of its members." (citing Bayerische Landesbank, Ne......
-
RL 900 Park, LLC v. Ender
...diversity jurisdiction, an LLC is a citizen of all the states in which its members are citizens. See Avant Capital Partners, LLC v. W108 Dev. LLC, 387 F. Supp. 3d 320, 322 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (citing Bayerische Landesbank, New York Branch v. Aladdin Capital Mgmt., LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d Cir. ......
-
Corniel v. Titech
...its principal place of business, but rather each of the states in which it has members. See, e.g., Avant Capital Partners, LLC v. W108 Dev. LLC, 387 F. Supp. 3d 320, 322 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) ("A limited liability company takes the citizenship of its members.") (citing Bayerische Landesbank, 692 ......
-
Guangzhou Yongjia Garment Mfg. Co. v. Zoomers Inc.
...place of business of any corporate entities who are members of the limited liability company," Avant Capital Partners, LLC v. W108 Dev. LLC, 387 F. Supp. 3d 320, 322 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (quoting New Millennium Capital Partners, III, LLC v. Juniper Grp. Inc., No. 10 Civ. 46 (PKC), 2010 WL 125732......