Avery Freight Lines v. Persons
Decision Date | 16 October 1947 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 471. |
Citation | 32 So.2d 886,250 Ala. 40 |
Parties | AVERY FREIGHT LINES, Inc., v. PERSONS et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1947.
Wm S. Pritchard and Winston B. McCall, both of Birmingham, and Hill, Hill, Whiting & Rives, of Montgomery, for appellant.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and MacDonald Gallion Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
This is an appeal from a final declaratory judgment of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, wherein it was adjudged and declared that the 'Avery Freight Lines, Inc.' (appellant), 'did not have the right and privilege to operate as an irregular common carrier of property on all roads in the State of Alabama in accordance with the terms of the decree of the Circuit Court of Mobile County, in Equity dated September 30, 1941.' The suit was instituted in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County by Avery Freight Lines, Inc. against the members of the Public Service Commission. Georgia Motor Express Co. Inc. and others intervened as parties defendant.
For an understanding of the case it is necessary to consider the effect of the decision of this court when the case was here previously on appeal. Avery Freight Lines v. White et al., 245 Ala. 618, 18 So.2d 394, 154 A.L.R. 732. On that appeal this court held in effect that the case called for a determination of the legal rights of the Avery Freight Lines, Inc. under the decree of the Circuit Court of Mobile County, in Equity. This court further held that such questions could not be settled until answer had been made. Accordingly the case was remanded to the lower court for such further proceedings. After answer was made, final decree was rendered, as aforesaid.
We think it unnecessary to restate all the facts which are set forth in the opinion on the first appeal. For present purposes it is sufficient to set forth the following. Avery Freight Lines, Inc. made application to the Public Service Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under what is known as the 'grandfather clause' of § 8 of the Act of 1939, p. 1069, now § 301(8), Title 48, Code of 1940, Pocket Part. On July 8, 1941, the Public Service Commission denied the same. Avery Freight Lines, Inc. appealed from the order to the Circuit Court of Mobile County as provided by the statute.
On appeal the Circuit Court of Mobile County, in Equity, entered its decree in pertinent part as follows:
'* * * the Court having considered all of the evidence certified by the said Alabama Public Service Commission, being all of the evidence in the cause, and the cause having been argued at length by the respective parties and the Court understanding the evidence and the issues presented, is of the opinion that the findings of facts as set forth in the report of the Commission, including the finding that, did not warrant the Commission in entering its order denying applicant 'Grandfather' rights. The Court is further of the opinion that the Commission erred to the prejudice of applicant's substantial rights in its application of the law to such facts, and that said order here appealed from should be modified to the extent herein provided, wherefore it is by the Court:
'Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed, as follows, the order entered by the Alabama Public Service Commission dated July 8th, 1941, in this matter is modified to provide that the applicant, Appellant, Avery Freight Lines, Inc., is entitled under the provisions of the Alabama Motor Carrier Act of 1939 and more specially Title 48, Paragraph 301(8) Code of Alabama 1940, to have a certificate of convenience and necessity under the proof and petition heretofore filed with the Alabama Public Service Commission, to operate as an irregular common carrier to the extent provided in the motor carrier permit issued to the appellant by Honorable Matt A. Boykin, Judge of Probate of Mobile County, Alabama, on the 22nd day of August, 1940, which gave and allowed applicant, appellant, here the right to operate as an irregular common carrier of property on all roads in the State of Alabama.
'The said order of the Commission is hereby further amended to provide that the Avery Freight Lines, Inc., appellant, may continue the operation of its said business as an irregular common carrier of property on all roads in the State of Alabama.'
In holding that this case calls for a determination of the legal rights of the Avery Freight Lines, Inc. under the aforesaid decree of the Circuit Court of Mobile County, in Equity, this Court on the first appeal said: Avery Freight Lines v. White, 245 Ala. 618, 18 So.2d 394, 400, 154 A.L.R. 732.
It seems clear to us that decision in this case must turn on the construction to be given the decree of the Mobile Circuit Court, in Equity, in the light of the statutes under which appeal was taken to that Court. Section 301(27), Title 48, Code of 1940, provides for an appeal from any final action or order of the Public Service Commission as follows:
It will be noted that the appeal 'shall be governed by the provisions of law now in force, or hereafter enacted, respecting appeals in other cases from the final order and actions of the Commission.' Accordingly the foregoing statute must be taken in connection with § 82, Title 48, Code of 1940 (North Alabama Motor Express Co. v. Rookis, 244 Ala. 137, 138, 12 So.2d 183), as follows:
Under the foregoing statutes, omitting consideration of a remand in advance of judgment because that is not here involved, the circuit court can do only three things. (1) It can affirm the order of the Public Service Commission. (2) It can set aside the order of the Public Service Commission. (3) It can remand the case to the Public Service Commission for further proceedings in conformity with the direction of the court. The legislature evidently did not intend 'that the reviewing court should put itself in the place of the commission, try the matter anew as an administrative body weigh the evidence and substitute its finding and judgment on the merits as that of the commission.' State v. Public Service Commission, 234 Mo.App. 470, 134 S.W.2d 1069, 1076; Id., 348 Mo. 613, 154 S.W.2d 777; 51 C.J. p. 758. See Alabama Public Service Commission v. Crow, 247 Ala. 120, 22 So.2d 721. The case of Avant Gas Co. v. Comm., 184 Okl. 583, 89 P.2d 291, 122 A.L.R. 189, cited by appellant, does not appear to be an authority against the position here...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Ry Co
...Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., supra. Here the plaintiff has exhausted its nonjudicial remedies. Avery Freight Lines, Inc., v. Persons, 1947, 250 Ala. 40, 32 So.2d 886. Concededly there is no State to construe. There is no consideration which should make a court of equity, as a matt......
-
Southern Ry. Co. v. ALABAMA PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N
...that the appellate procedure therein provided is a part of the administrative process. We do not agree. In Avery Freight Lines, Inc. v. Persons, 1947, 250 Ala. 40, 32 So.2d 886, 889, the Supreme Court of Alabama, in holding that an appeal to the Circuit Court under the statutes concerned wa......
-
Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
... ... v. Rookis, 244 Ala. 137, 12 So.2d 183; Avery Freight ... Lines v. White, 245 Ala. 618, 18 So.2d 394, 154 A.L.R ... Crowe, 247 ... Ala. 120, 22 So.2d 721; Avery Freight Lines v. Persons et ... al., 250 Ala. 40, 32 So.2d 886 and Alabama Public ... Service ... ...
-
Calhoun v. Calhoun
...States Constitution, Article IV, Section 1. The Wisconsin decree is divisible as is the Alabama decree. Avery Freight Lines, Inc. v. Persons, et al, 250 Ala. 40, 32 So.2d 886; Eule v. Eule, 9 Wis.2d 115, 100 N.W.2d 554. The Wisconsin court had prior jurisdiction over the marital res of the ......