B. Forman Company v. CIR

Decision Date10 January 1972
Docket Number35839,71-1026,Dockets 35434,No. 768-771,71-1027.,768-771
PartiesB. FORMAN COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant. McCURDY & COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant. B. FORMAN COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. McCURDY & COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Ellsworth A. Van Graafeiland and Peter L. Faber, Rochester, N. Y. (Wiser, Shaw, Freeman, Van Graafeiland, Harter & Secrest, Richard B. Secrest and William M. Colby, Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for taxpayers.

Stephen Schwarz, Atty., Tax Div. (Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Harry Baum, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner.

Before CLARK, Associate Justice,* SMITH, Circuit Judge, and ZAVATT, District Judge.**

ZAVATT, District Judge.

These are cross-appeals from a decision of the Tax Court, 54 T.C. 913 (1970), holding (1) that 26 U.S.C. § 482 (the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, hereinafter the "Code") did not authorize the Commissioner to allocate to B. Forman Co., Inc. (Forman) and McCurdy & Co., Inc. (McCurdy) (both referred to herein as taxpayers) interest income attributable to interest free loans made by the taxpayers to Midtown Holdings Corp. (Midtown), because of the absence of the requisite § 482 control of Midtown by the taxpayers; and (2) that annual payments of $75,000.00 each made by taxpayers to Midtown were not ordinary and necessary business expenses deductible under 26 U.S.C. § 162. The Commissioner appeals from the first of these holdings; the taxpayers appeal from the second. We reverse the decision of the Tax Court as to the first and affirm as to the second of these holdings.

These consolidated cases involve the corporate income tax liability of Forman and of McCurdy for the fiscal years 1965, 1966 and 1967. Having disallowed the annual payments of $75,000.00 each year by the taxpayers to Midtown and having allocated as income to each taxpayer interest at the rate of 5% per annum on a $1,000,000.00 loan made by each taxpayer to Midtown prior to the fiscal years in question, the Commissioner assessed tax deficiencies against each taxpayer (now in dispute) as follows:

                Forman McCurdy
                1965                   $ 62,425.55         $ 59,181.99
                1966                     58,775.14           59,643.92
                1967                     59,692.00           62,343.56
                                       ___________         ___________
                Totals                 $180,892.69         $181,169.47
                

Following receipt of the Commissioner's notices of these deficiencies and on January 31, 1969, each taxpayer filed a petition with the Tax Court for a review of the respective tax deficiency determinations of the Commissioner, both of which petitions were consolidated.

For several years prior to and as of the date of incorporation of Midtown, McCurdy (a New York corporation since 1901) operated a retail general department store at 285 Main Street East, Rochester, New York and Forman (a New York corporation since 1912) operated a retail department store, specializing in men's and women's apparel, at 46 Clinton Avenue South, Rochester, New York. All of the stock of McCurdy was owned by or in behalf of members of the McCurdy family. All of the stock of Forman was owned by or in behalf of members of the Forman family. McCurdy and Forman had no common shareholders, directors or officers. Both corporations were competitors.

In an effort to stem declining incomes, McCurdy and Forman caused Midtown to be formed in 1958. On March 23, 1959 they entered into an agreement with reference to their participation in the building and development of a midtown shopping center in Rochester which would adjoin the rear entrances to their respective stores. By that time the Board of Directors and officers of Midtown consisted of the following:

                Relationship to McCurdy
                and Forman
                Gilbert J. C. McCurdy (President      — Chairman of the Board of
                and Chairman of Board of               Directors and President of McCurdy
                Directors of Midtown)
                Gordon W. McCurdy (Secretary          — Vice-Chairman of the Board
                and a Director of Midtown)             of Directors and Senior
                                                       Vice-President of McCurdy
                Maurice R. Forman (Vice-President     — Chairman of the Board of
                and a Director of Midtown)             Directors and President of Forman
                Fred Forman (Treasurer and a          — Member of the Board of
                Director of Midtown)                   Directors and Senior Vice-President
                                                       of Forman
                Lynn Johnston (Vice-President and
                General Manager of
                Midtown)
                

It would appear from that agreement that when, in 1958, McCurdy and Forman decided to form Midtown and erect a shopping center in downtown Rochester, they each entered into lease agreements (with options to purchase) with the owners of the property on which they contemplated the construction of the shopping center. These properties are described in the appendices to the agreement of March 23, 1959. In and by that agreement McCurdy and Forman agreed to assign and transfer to Midtown their respective interests in these leases and options and to convey title to any such property already vested.

McCurdy and Forman had already acquired 50% each of the issued and outstanding shares of Midtown. In exchange for the real estate interests they were to assign and convey to Midtown, each of them was to receive an additional 810 common, no par value shares of Midtown, thus continuing their equal stock ownership in Midtown. If, prior to January 1, 1965, the Board of Directors of Midtown should determine, by resolution, that additional funds were necessary or advisable, McCurdy and Forman agreed to purchase additional shares of Midtown "so that their aggregate holding shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each, at any time, and from time to time . . ." In addition, each party to this agreement agreed to loan to Midtown additional amounts

"so that their aggregate loans to Midtown shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each, at any time and from time to time, if, prior to January 1, 1965, the Board of Directors of Midtown, by resolution, shall determine that such additional funds in the form of borrowing are necessary or advisable. Loans shall be made equally by the parties.
Such loans shall be represented by notes, or other evidence of indebtedness, of Midtown, the essential features of which shall be as follows:
(A) The notes shall pay interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum, payable semi-annually on the first day of January and July in each year.
(B) The notes shall be due and payable thirty (30) years after issuance.
(C) Midtown shall have the right to prepay the notes in whole or in part on any interest paying date prior to maturity upon the payment of the principal amount thereof and accrued interest.
(D) The notes may be unsecured but shall not be subordinated to the claims of any other unsecured creditor of Midtown.
(E) The notes shall be part of a series, and there shall be no preference between the parties hereto as to payment of the notes of a series."

This agreement also provided for the control of Midtown by McCurdy and Forman by requiring each party thereto to vote its respective Midtown stock so as to provide for a Board of Directors consisting of three Directors designated by the Board of Directors of McCurdy and three Directors designated by the Board of Directors of Forman. At the request of either McCurdy or Forman, each party to the agreement undertook to vote its Midtown stock for a seventh Director. In the event they were unable to agree upon the seventh Director, McCurdy and Forman were to designate their respective representatives who would designate the seventh Director to be elected "by the parties hereto . ." In the event that these representatives were unable to agree upon a seventh Director, a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Fourth Judicial Department, was to act with the two representatives and the seventh Director of Midtown was then to be designated by majority vote of the Justice and the two representatives of the parties.

The agreement also limited the right of the parties to dispose of their Midtown stock to detailed conditions set forth therein.

Although the agreement provided for the designation of three Midtown Directors each by the parties, there were only four. During all of the relevant times the officers and directors of Midtown were:

                President and Director                Gilbert J. C. McCurdy
                Vice President and Director           Maurice R. Forman
                Secretary and Director                Gordon W. McCurdy
                Treasurer and Director                Fred Forman (until his death)
                                                      Robert Aex (after Fred Forman's death)
                                                      Aex represented Forman's interests
                Vice President and                    Lynn Johnston (to April 1, 1963)
                 General Manager
                                                      Angelo Chiarella (from May 27, 1963 on)
                

The shopping center, completed and opened for business in 1962, consisted of an eighteen story building, a four story building (adjoining the Mall), and a three level underground parking garage. Each taxpayer initially invested a total of $1,000,000.00 in return for Midtown stock. The original estimated cost of the shopping center was $8,000,000.00. The actual cost exceeded $18,000,000.00.

Construction commenced in 1959. The record does not reveal all of the financing for this project. It does show that Midtown entered into a building loan agreement with Lincoln Rochester Trust Company (Lincoln), dated April 18,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
54 cases
  • Investment Research Associates, Ltd. v. Commissioner, Docket No. 43966-85.
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 15 Diciembre 1999
    ...prevent evasion of taxes or to properly reflect each enterprise's income. See B. Forman Co. v. Commissioner [72-1 USTC ¶ 9182], 453 F.2d 1144, 1152 (2d Cir. 1972), affg. in part, revg. in part [Dec. 30,087] 54 T.C. 912 Section 482 was intended to apply and has been applied to cases where th......
  • IN RE APPEAL OF PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO.
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 25 Enero 2002
    ...that this omission was intentional in order to allow for flexibility of administration. [Citation omitted.]" B. Forman Company v. C.I.R., 453 F.2d 1144, 1152 (2d Cir. 1972),cert. denied 407 U.S. 934 (1972). The IRS/Treasury Regulation, 26 C.F.R. § 1.482-1(i)(4), p. 538 (2001), states, howev......
  • Latham Park Manor, Inc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 9 Noviembre 1977
    ...situations where no income was realized from the loan received by the controlled recipient organization. In B. Forman Co. v. Commissioner, 453 F.2d 1144, 1156 (2d Cir. 1972), affg. in part and revg. in part 54 T.C. 912 (1973), cert. denied 407 U.S. 934 (1972),9 the court, after quoting sect......
  •  R.T. French Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 6 Septiembre 1973
    ...Pauline W. Ach, 42 T.C. 114, 125-126, affirmed 358 F.2d 342 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied 385 U.S. 809; see also B. Forman Co. v. Commissioner, 453 F.2d 1144, 1151-1152 (C.A. 2), reversing in part and affirming in part 54 T.C. 912, certiorari denied 407 U.S. 934, rehearing denied 409 U.S. 899......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT