E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C.
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | MAIN, Justice. |
| Citation | E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C., 212 So.3d 149 (Ala. 2016) |
| Decision Date | 13 May 2016 |
| Docket Number | 1141259,1141416. |
| Parties | E.B. INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. v. PAVILION DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., et al. Pavilion Development, L.L.C. v. JBJ Partnership et al. |
E. Ray McKee, Jr., Huntsville, for appellant E.B. Investments, L.L.C.
H. Carey Walker III of Adams & Walker, P.C., Huntsville, for appellee/cross–appellant Pavilion Development, L.L.C.
Robert C. Gammons of Harrison, Gammons & Rawlinson, P.C., Huntsville, for appellees JBJ Partnership, Pace Properties, James Patrick Pace, individually and as personal representative of the estate of James Edgar Pace, and William Byron Pace.
F. Page Gamble, Birmingham, for appellees Atlantis Development Company, Inc., and Javad Ajdarodini.
E.B. Investments, L.L.C. ("EB Investments"), appeals from an order of the Madison Circuit Court holding that Pavilion Development, L.L.C. ("Pavilion"), was entitled to redeem certain property in Madison County in which EB Investments and other parties held legal interests (appeal no. 1141259). Pavilion filed a separate appeal naming as appellees JBJ Partnership ("JBJ"), Pace Properties ("Pace"), James P. Pace, individually and as personal representative of the estate of James E. Pace, and William Byron Pace and challenging certain aspects of the same order, namely, the amount it must pay to redeem the property (appeal no. 1141416). The appeals were consolidated for the purpose of issuing one opinion. As to EB Investments' appeal, we affirm in part and dismiss the appeal in part. As to Pavilion's appeal, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
This nearly two-decade-old case is a veteran of numerous appellate campaigns. Pavilion's attempted redemption of the property at issue has given rise to five opinions from this Court. See Ex parte Atlantis Dev. Co., 897 So.2d 1022 (Ala.2004) ; EB Invs., L.L.C. v. Atlantis Dev., Inc., 930 So.2d 502 (Ala.2005) ; Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P'ship, 979 So.2d 24 (Ala.2007) ( "Pavilion I "); Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P'ship, 77 So.3d 133 (Ala.2011) ("Pavilion II "); and Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P'ship, 142 So.3d 535 (Ala.2013) ("Pavilion III "). Although the facts of this redemption case are "immensely complicated," Pavilion III, 142 So.3d at 535, they have been recited by this Court on several occasions:
Pavilion II, 77 So.3d at 134–35 (footnotes omitted).
In Pavilion III we summarized the proceedings following our remand in Pavilion I:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Cantrell v. Cantrell
... ... " ' Kennedy v. Boles Invs., Inc. , 53 So.3d ... 60, 67-68 (Ala ... " E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. , ... 212 So.3d 149, 162 (Ala ... ...
-
Sims v. Sims
...evidence, our review is de novo. Weeks v. Wolf Creek Indus., Inc., 941 So.2d 263, 268–69 (Ala.2006)."E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C., 212 So.3d 149, 162 (Ala.2016) (emphasis added). On appeal, the mother argues that there was no "settlement agreement" or "negotiated settlement a......
-
Great Bend Yacht Club, Inc. v. MacLeod
...facts and where the judgment is based entirely upon documentary evidence, [appellate] review is de novo." E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C., 212 So.3d 149, 162 (Ala. 2016). See also McCulloch v. Roberts, 292 Ala. 451, 454, 296 So.2d 163, 164 (1974) (noting that, when the trial cou......
-
Ex parte Johnson
... ... [appellate] review is de novo.' E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v ... Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. , 212 ... ...