E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C.
Decision Date | 13 May 2016 |
Docket Number | 1141259,1141416. |
Citation | 212 So.3d 149 |
Parties | E.B. INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. v. PAVILION DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., et al. Pavilion Development, L.L.C. v. JBJ Partnership et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
E. Ray McKee, Jr., Huntsville, for appellant E.B. Investments, L.L.C.
H. Carey Walker III of Adams & Walker, P.C., Huntsville, for appellee/cross–appellant Pavilion Development, L.L.C.
Robert C. Gammons of Harrison, Gammons & Rawlinson, P.C., Huntsville, for appellees JBJ Partnership, Pace Properties, James Patrick Pace, individually and as personal representative of the estate of James Edgar Pace, and William Byron Pace.
F. Page Gamble, Birmingham, for appellees Atlantis Development Company, Inc., and Javad Ajdarodini.
E.B. Investments, L.L.C. ("EB Investments"), appeals from an order of the Madison Circuit Court holding that Pavilion Development, L.L.C. ("Pavilion"), was entitled to redeem certain property in Madison County in which EB Investments and other parties held legal interests (appeal no. 1141259). Pavilion filed a separate appeal naming as appellees JBJ Partnership ("JBJ"), Pace Properties ("Pace"), James P. Pace, individually and as personal representative of the estate of James E. Pace, and William Byron Pace and challenging certain aspects of the same order, namely, the amount it must pay to redeem the property (appeal no. 1141416). The appeals were consolidated for the purpose of issuing one opinion. As to EB Investments' appeal, we affirm in part and dismiss the appeal in part. As to Pavilion's appeal, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
This nearly two-decade-old case is a veteran of numerous appellate campaigns. Pavilion's attempted redemption of the property at issue has given rise to five opinions from this Court. See Ex parte Atlantis Dev. Co., 897 So.2d 1022 (Ala.2004) ; EB Invs., L.L.C. v. Atlantis Dev., Inc., 930 So.2d 502 (Ala.2005) ; Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P'ship, 979 So.2d 24 (Ala.2007) ( "Pavilion I "); Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P'ship, 77 So.3d 133 (Ala.2011) ("Pavilion II "); and Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. v. JBJ P'ship, 142 So.3d 535 (Ala.2013) ("Pavilion III "). Although the facts of this redemption case are "immensely complicated," Pavilion III, 142 So.3d at 535, they have been recited by this Court on several occasions:
Pavilion II, 77 So.3d at 134–35 (footnotes omitted).
In Pavilion III we summarized the proceedings following our remand in Pavilion I:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson Realty Grp. v. King
... Anderson Realty Group, LLC v. J.C. King III No. 2201014 Alabama Court ... E.B. Investments, L.L.C. v. Pavilion Development, ... L.L.C. , 212 So.3d 149, ... 1998). See also E.B. Invs. , 212 ... So.3d at 167. Thus, we agree ... ...
-
Cantrell v. Cantrell
... ... " ' Kennedy v. Boles Invs., Inc. , 53 So.3d ... 60, 67-68 (Ala ... " E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C. , ... 212 So.3d 149, 162 (Ala ... ...
-
Sims v. Sims
...evidence, our review is de novo. Weeks v. Wolf Creek Indus., Inc., 941 So.2d 263, 268–69 (Ala.2006)."E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C., 212 So.3d 149, 162 (Ala.2016) (emphasis added). On appeal, the mother argues that there was no "settlement agreement" or "negotiated settlement a......
-
Great Bend Yacht Club, Inc. v. MacLeod
...the judgment is based entirely upon documentary evidence, [appellate] review is de novo." E.B. Invs., L.L.C. v. Pavilion Dev., L.L.C., 212 So.3d 149, 162 (Ala. 2016). See also 280 So.3d 415 McCulloch v. Roberts, 292 Ala. 451, 454, 296 So.2d 163, 164 (1974) (noting that, when the trial court......