Baca v. Starr

Decision Date30 April 2012
Docket NumberNo. 11–834.,11–834.
CitationBaca v. Starr, 132 S.Ct. 2101(Mem), 182 L.Ed.2d 882(Mem), 566 U.S. 982 (2012)
Parties Leroy BACA, Los Angeles County Sheriff, petitioner, v. Dion STARR.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
42 cases
  • Kandi v. Langford
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • November 14, 2018
    ... ... See generally Starr v. Baca , 652 F.3d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 2011) ("Although 'more limited in some respects,' a Bivens action is the federal analog to an action ... ...
  • Scott v. Beregovskay
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • September 19, 2018
    ... ... Starr v. Baca , 652 F.3d 1202, 1207 (9th Cir. 2011). "There is no respondeat superior liability under [] 1983." Taylor v. List , 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 ... ...
  • Barrett v. Ciolli, 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • July 12, 2021
    ... ... misnomer.”) A government official is only liable for ... his or her own misconduct. Id.; Starr v. Baca , 652 ... F.3d 1202, 1205-08 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied , ... 566 U.S. 982 (2012). Therefore, when a named defendant holds ... ...
  • Barrett v. Ciolli, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • May 3, 2021
    ... ... the term "supervisory liability" is a misnomer.") A government official is only liable for his or her own misconduct. Id ... ; Starr v ... Baca , 652 F.3d 1202, 1205-08 (9th Cir. 2011), cert ... denied , 566 U.S. 982 (2012). Plaintiff has not alleged any facts indicating that Warden ... ...
  • Get Started for Free