Bacon v. City of Antigo
| Decision Date | 25 April 1899 |
| Citation | 103 Wis. 10,79 N.W. 31 |
| Parties | BACON v. CITY OF ANTIGO. |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Langlade county; John Goodland, Judge.
Action by Gilbert Bacon against the city of Antigo. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.W. F. White and D. G. Classon, for appellant.
F. J. Finucane and Max Hoffmann, for respondent.
The plaintiff brought action against the city for personal injuries suffered on account of a defective sidewalk upon a street in the defendant city, and alleged service of a notice of the injury by filing the same with the city clerk, for presentation to the city council, within 60 days after the injury. Upon the trial, a general demurrer ore tenus to the complaint was sustained, on the ground that the complaint did not allege the presentation of the claim to the common council. The charter of the city provides (Laws 1889, c. 197, § 139) that no action in tort shall lie or be maintained against the city, “unless a statement in writing signed by the person injured or claiming to be injured, of the wrong and circumstances thereof, and the amount of damages claimed shall be presented to the common council within sixty days after the occurring or happening of the tort alleged.” The trial court held that filing the claim with the city clerk for presentation to the council did not satisfy this provision. This holding was, we think, erroneous. The city clerk is the custodian of all the papers and records of the city, and required to attend all meetings of the council, and keep a correct record of its proceedings. Id. § 58. It is his manifest duty to place before the council all claims of the nature of the one before us which are filed with him for presentation to the council. There is no other orderly way in which a claimant can make sure of presentation of his claim to the council. If he must wait until a meeting of the council is held, and present it in open meeting, he might be denied an opportunity to present it at all, by mere failure of the council to meet; and he might also be denied the full 60 days' time which the statute gives him in which to present it. This view is in accord with the construction given to similar provisions of statute in the cases of Parish v. Town of Eden, 62 Wis. 272, 22 N. W. 399, and Mason v. City of Ashland, 98 Wis. 540, 74 N. W. 357, although at variance with the holding in Hiner v. City of Fond du Lac, 71 Wis. 74, 36 N. W. 632, which...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McLendon v. City of Houston
...compliance' with the provisions of the city charter requiring notice to the municipal corporation. The case of Bacon v. City of Antigo, 103 Wis. 10, 79 N.W. 31, holds that a claimant for personal injuries against a city sufficiently presents his claim to the city council by filing it with t......
-
Tiggerman v. City of Butte
...which such notice shall be given. This view finds support in the following decided cases, and others cited therein: Bacon v. Autigo, 103 Wis. 10, 79 N. W. 31;Doyle v. Duluth, 74 Minn. 157, 76 N. W. 1029;Pyke v. St. James, 15 N. D. 157, 107 N. W. 359. The decision in Hensley v. City of Butte......
-
Oshkosh Waterworks Co. v. City of Oshkosh
...60-day period did not expire until January 9, 1899, and the appeal was taken in time. Following the rule laid down in Bacon v. City of Antigo, 103 Wis. 10, 79 N. W. 31, where a similar charter provision was involved, we must hold that the filing of the claim with the clerk was the presentat......
- May v. Chi. & N. W. Ry. Co.