Badger Silver Min. Co. v. Drake

Decision Date12 April 1898
Docket Number633.
Citation88 F. 48
PartiesBADGER SILVER MIN. CO. v. DRAKE.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against A. M Drake and Levy Mayer in the circuit court of Suwannee county Fla., and removed to the federal court, no service being had upon Mayer.

The action was brought upon the following contract:

This agreement, made at Milwaukee, in the state of Wisconsin, this 13th day of January, 1891, by and between the Badger Silver Mining Company, of Gillies, Ontario, a corporation, organized under the laws of Wisconsin, party of the first part, and Herbert N. Nichols, of Denver, Col., party of the second part, witnesseth:

First. Said first party hereby agrees to sell, transfer, assign convey, and deliver unto said second party all the property of every kind, character, and description, of said first party, real, personal, and mixed, wheresoever situate, whether enumerated herein or not. Said property embraces, among other things, the following: That part of mining location known as 200 T, commencing at the northeast corner of said 200 T; thence, running south, along the east line of said 200 T, 12 chains 98 links, more or less, to a point; thence west 80 chains 8 links, more or less, to the west boundary of said 200 T; thence north twelve chains 98 links, more or less, to the northwest corner of said 200 T; thence east, along the north line of said 200 T, 80 chains 13 links, more or less, to the point of beginning,-- containing one hundred and four acres, more or less, comprising all the land in said 200 T deeded to the said first party by John M. Stowell. Also the mining location known as 201 T and 96 T, the said 201 T and 96 T, together with the said land in said 200 T, embracing 360 acres, more or less, all of said location being in the township of Gillies, district of Thunder Bay, province of Ontario, Canada. Also all mills, buildings, improvements, fixtures, machinery, tools, implements, and supplies in, upon, or about said mining locations, or used in connection with the working and operation of the same. Also all ores of every description, wherever the same may be. Also all books, maps, plans, papers, and documents, now in use or heretofore used in connection with the working of said mining location or the business connected therewith or otherwise. Said first party hereby covenants and agrees that it has a good, clear, free, absolute, and uninterrupted right to sell, transfer, assign, convey, and deliver all of the foregoing property, and every part thereof; that it has an absolute and indefeasible title in fee simple to all of said real estate, and that it is the absolute owner of all said personal property; that all of said property, real, personal, and mixed, and wheresoever situate, is free and clear from all mortgages, charges, incumbrances, liens, claims, taxes, and assessments whatsoever, except as hereinafter stated; and that it will forever warrant and defend the title to said property, and every part thereof, against any and all person or persons, corporation and corporations, whatsoever. Absolute and uninterrupted possession of all the said property in manner and form as aforesaid shall be delivered to said second party on or before February 10th, 1891, and none of said property of any kind shall be removed or disposed of in any way by said first party, its agents or employes, on and after the date hereof. It is the intent of this agreement that though absolute possession may not be delivered until on or before February 10th, 1891, the same shall take effect on, and relate back to, the date hereof. It is understood that the said first party, for purposes of convenience, has held and holds the title to said mining location 96 T, otherwise known as the 'Porcupine Mine,' in the name of John M. Stowell, as trustee, the president of said first party, and that the mining location last aforesaid is subject to an incumbrance of about $13,000.00. It is covenanted and agreed by said first party that, contemporaneously with the making of the payment of the sum of $24,000.00 hereinafter referred to, the said amount or so much thereof as is necessary shall be immediately applied towards the complete release and payment of said incumbrance, and that contemporaneously therewith the said Stowell shall execute and deliver to the escrow hereinafter mentioned a good and sufficient warranty deed running to the said second party or his assigns, and containing covenants of warranty on the part of said Stowell against any and all acts and omissions on his part, and containing also full covenants of warranty on the part of the said first party. The deed last aforesaid shall at once be joined in by the wife of the said Stowell, releasing all her dower and homestead rights, if any, therein. The said deed, immediately upon its execution, shall be delivered in escrow to the American Trust & Savings Bank, of Chicago, Ill., by said bank to be held until all of the payments hereinafter referred to have been made in manner as hereinafter set forth, on the making of which the said deed shall be delivered by said bank to said second party or his assigns. Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this contract, the said first party shall execute and deliver to said escrow full and complete and absolute instruments of transfer and conveyance, containing full covenants of warranty, and conveying to said second party or his assigns all of the property hereinbefore specified. Said instruments of transfer and conveyance shall be held by said escrow until all the payments hereinafter referred to have been made in manner as hereinafter set forth, and, immediately upon the making of the same, shall be delivered to said second party or his assigns.

Second. Said second party hereby agrees to and does purchase all of the foregoing property, and agrees to and shall pay therefor the sum of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in manner following: $1,000 in cash upon the date of the execution of this agreement, the receipt of which by said first party is hereby acknowledged; $24,000.00 in cash on or before February 10th, 1891; $25,000 in cash on or before May 1st, 1891, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum; $25,000 shall be paid into said bank as escrow on or before Sept. 1st, 1891, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum; $50,000 shall be paid into said bank as escrow on or before December 1st, 1891, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum; $50,000 shall be paid into said bank as escrow on or before March 1st, 1892, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum; $75,000 shall be paid into said bank as escrow on or before July 1st, 1892, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum. If the titles to the said property or any part thereof shall upon examination by the solicitors of said party of the second part be found to be other than as hereinbefore covenanted, then, upon notice of said fact to said escrow, the said moneys so to be deposited with the said escrow as aforesaid shall not be paid over to said first party until the defects in said title, if any, shall have been satisfactorily cured, or the value of said defects adjusted and paid or abated to said second party or his assigns; and thereafter, or in the event of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hill v. Gratigny Plateau Development Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 9 Octubre 1931
    ...is not enforceable against an undisclosed principal. Willard v. Wood, 135 U. S. 309, 10 S. Ct. 831, 34 L. Ed. 210; Badger Silver Min. Co. v. Drake (C. C. A.) 88 F. 48; Western Sugar R. Co. v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Ins. Co. (C. C.) 163 F. 644; Seretto v. Schell, 247 Mass. 173, 141 N. E. 871. A......
  • Marks v. Kindel
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 27 Junio 1930
    ...v. Manger, 185 Wis. 63, 200 N. W. 663; Baird v. Publishers' National Service Bureau, 51 N. D. 374, 199 N. W. 757; Badger Silver Mining Co. v. Drake (C. C. A.) 88 F. 48. The cases cited by plaintiffs which are asserted to hold otherwise generally turn upon some fact or circumstance appearing......
  • McMullen v. McMullen, s. 2902
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 12 Octubre 1962
    ...Mitchell v. St. Andrew's Bay Land Co., 1851, 4 Fla. 200, and by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth District, in Badger Silver Mining Co. v. Drake, C.C.A. 5th, 1898, 88 F. 48. Appellants contend that the common law rule has been modified in Florida by Humphrey v. Bussey, 1930, 99 Fla. 1249,......
  • Wood v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Tennessee
    • 2 Junio 1898

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT