Badgley v. State, Nos. 28417

Docket NºNos. 28417
Citation226 Ind. 665, 82 N.E.2d 841
Case DateDecember 16, 1948
CourtSupreme Court of Indiana

226 Ind. 665
82 N.E.2d 841

BADGLEY
v.
STATE.
BROWN
v.
STATE.

Nos. 28417, 28418.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Dec. 16, 1948.


Frank Badgley and Robert Oscar Brown were convicted of murder in the first degree, and they appeal.

Judgments affirmed.

[82 N.E.2d 842]

Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court, Robert Thompson, Special judge.
T. Ernest Maholm, of Indianapolis, for appellants.

Cleon H. Foust, Atty. Gen., and Merl M. Wall, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.


EMMERT, Judge.

These are separate appeals from judgments convicting each appellant of murder in the first degree entered upon the verdict so finding each appellant guilty and fixing the penalty at death.

On February 6, 1947, the grand jury of Lake County returned a joint indictment against both appellants for the first degree murder of John Gerka on the 11th day of January, 1947. Counsel was appointed for each appellant before arraignment, and to the indictment each entered a plea of not guilty. The venue of the cause was changed from Lake County to Jasper County, upon the granting of the verified motion for change of venue from the county filed by the appellant Badgley, and later a change of venue from the regular presiding judge of the Jasper Circuit Court was had upon the verified motion of the appellant Brown. The examination of the jury on the voir dire was begun on the 14th day of October, 1947, and subsequent proceedings in impaneling the jury and the trial continued until the 22nd day of November, when the jury returned a verdict of guilty as to each appellant.

Upon appeal after a conviction, only the evidence most favorable to the state, and all reasonable and logical inferences that may be drawn therefrom, will be considered by this court, and this rule applies in appeals in capital cases. Keith v. State, 1901, 157 Ind. 376, 61 N.E. 716. From an examination of all the evidence the jury was warranted in finding the crime, and the preceding and subsequent events, occurred as follows:

The appellant Frank Badgley was acquainted with the appellant Robert Oscar Brown, and on January 11, 1947, at about 9:00 o'clock A.M. Badgley in company with other of his relatives was leaving Indianapolis for Chicago by automobile to see another relative who was in the hospital there, all of them riding in an automobile being driven by one of his relatives. At Badgley's suggestion they stopped along East Washington Street in Indianapolis and picked up Brown who was accompanying him. They arrived in Chicago that same evening where they had supper at the home of relatives. Other relatives came to the same house, and after supper Brown and Badgley requested to be driven to Calumet City to see an acquaintance of Brown's. Some of the relatives then drove Brown and Badgley to Hammond, Indiana, where at about 7:30 P.M. the two left the car, which was then driven back to Chicago.

The appellants Brown and Badgley then stole a 1941 Chevrolet automobile by cutting

[82 N.E.2d 843]

the ignition cable and connecting a jumper wire to by-pass the ignition lock, and drove east on Cleveland Street in Hammond, where they parked the car in front of some vacant lots and waited for an opportunity to change the license plates. There were two guns on the front seat between the appellants, Badgley having a .38 caliber Smith & Wesson ‘lemon squeezer’ (hammerless) revolver and Brown having a .45 caliber army automatic, both guns being loaded.

There was snow on the ground, snow and ice on the streets, and the atmosphere was clear, with a street light shining about 150 feet east of the scene of the murder. John Gerka, who for some time had been a member of the police force of Hammond, was in uniform, armed, and was showing Donald Cook and Rudolph Mamala, Jr., who had just been appointed to the police department and who had not yet received uniforms or revolvers, the area they would patrol. They were riding in the Hammond Police Department squad car No. 9 which was being driven by Cook. At about 9.00 o'clock P.M. the police officers discovered the stolen Chevrolet as it stood parked with Brown and Badgley occuying the front seat, but drove on by and turned around by using other streets and came back driving east on Cleveland Street, stopping the squad car facing east 5 or 6 feet north of the stolen car, the front end being about even with the middle of the Chevrolet. The headlights on the squad car were on. Officer Gerka left the police car and went to the door of the stolen Chevrolet. The appellant Badgley got out of the Chevrolet and said to Officer Gerka, ‘I guess you want to see my driver's license,’ to which Gerka answered, ‘Yes.’ Officer Mamala got out of the squad car and noticed Badgley hunch his shoulders, whereupon Gerka grappled with Badgley and said, ‘Rudy, he's got a gun.’ Officer Mamala seized Badgley and slammed him up against the car, Gerka having taken Badgley's gun from him. The appellant Brown had gotten out of the Chevrolet from the other side and went around to the rear where he began shooting with the .45 automatic at Gerka. Gerka ducked down in front of the squad car and fired at Brown and said, ‘Cook, call for help.’ The rapid exchange of fire continued until both guns were empty, but Gerka did not use his service revolver. Gerka then said, ‘I'm hit,’ and fell to the street. Officer Mamala saw Brown aiming at Gerka, when he released Badgley and dived for Brown, both of them falling on the ice struggling for the gun. The gun flew up in the air and landed about 10 feet away, each attempting to get the gun first. Mamala seized Brown by the coat, which came off, and again seized Brown by a green sweater he was wearing, which also came off. Both continued to struggle for the sum, which was then empty with the slide locked open. Brown managed to hit Officer Mamala over the head with the gun, but Mamala choked and shook Brown until the gun again flew away about 15 feet. Mamala recovered the gun, but Brown by that time was running down an alley to escape. Officer Gerka had been shot through the chest and spinal cord and was dying along the gutter on the north side of the street, and Officer Cook, who had remained behind the wheel of squad car No. 9 and had twice radioed for help, was fatally shot, from which wounds he died two days later.

Other members of the Hammond Police Department soon arrived and Officers Cook and Gerka were removed to the hospital. The two guns, the coat and sweater worn by Brown, and other clothing and articles of the appellants, were recovered by the various members of the police force....

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 practice notes
  • Wisehart v. State, No. 48S00-9005-PD-378
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • March 19, 1998
    ...to place Wisehart's alleged mental illness before the jury without complying with the notice of insanity statute. See Badgley v. State, 226 Ind. 665, 676, 82 N.E.2d 841, 845 (1948); Taylor v. State, 181 Ind.App. 392, 394 n. 2, 391 N.E.2d 1182, 1183 n. 2 (1979). It was not deficient performa......
  • Kallas v. State, 28469.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • February 4, 1949
    ...applies in appeals in capital cases. Keith v. State, 1905, 157 Ind. 376, 61 N.E. [83 N.E.2d 772] 716; Badgley v. State, Ind.Sup., 1949, 82 N.E.2d 841. From an examination of the evidence it appears that the facts involved in this crime were as follows: The appellant, Thomas Kallas, age 57 y......
  • Kallas v. State, No. 28469.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • February 4, 1949
    ...applies in appeals in capital cases. [83 N.E.2d 772]Keith v. State, 1905, 157 Ind. 376, 61 N.E. 716;Badgley v. State, Ind.Sup., 1949, 82 N.E.2d 841. From an examination of the evidence it appears that the facts involved in this crime were as follows: The appellant, Thomas Kallas, age 57 yea......
  • Steffler v. State, No. 28694
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • April 2, 1952
    ...in the record most favorable to the state together with all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom. Badgley v. State, 1948, 226 Ind. 665, 82 N.E.2d 841; Keith v. State, 1901, 157 Ind. 376, 61 N.E. When the evidence is so considered, the jury had the right to find the facts as fol......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • Wisehart v. State, No. 48S00-9005-PD-378
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • March 19, 1998
    ...to place Wisehart's alleged mental illness before the jury without complying with the notice of insanity statute. See Badgley v. State, 226 Ind. 665, 676, 82 N.E.2d 841, 845 (1948); Taylor v. State, 181 Ind.App. 392, 394 n. 2, 391 N.E.2d 1182, 1183 n. 2 (1979). It was not deficient performa......
  • Kallas v. State, 28469.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • February 4, 1949
    ...applies in appeals in capital cases. Keith v. State, 1905, 157 Ind. 376, 61 N.E. [83 N.E.2d 772] 716; Badgley v. State, Ind.Sup., 1949, 82 N.E.2d 841. From an examination of the evidence it appears that the facts involved in this crime were as follows: The appellant, Thomas Kallas, age 57 y......
  • Kallas v. State, No. 28469.
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • February 4, 1949
    ...applies in appeals in capital cases. [83 N.E.2d 772]Keith v. State, 1905, 157 Ind. 376, 61 N.E. 716;Badgley v. State, Ind.Sup., 1949, 82 N.E.2d 841. From an examination of the evidence it appears that the facts involved in this crime were as follows: The appellant, Thomas Kallas, age 57 yea......
  • Steffler v. State, No. 28694
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • April 2, 1952
    ...in the record most favorable to the state together with all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom. Badgley v. State, 1948, 226 Ind. 665, 82 N.E.2d 841; Keith v. State, 1901, 157 Ind. 376, 61 N.E. When the evidence is so considered, the jury had the right to find the facts as fol......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT