Bagley v. Watson, Civ. No. 80-573FR.
Decision Date | 04 July 1983 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 80-573FR. |
Citation | 579 F. Supp. 1099 |
Parties | Nedra BAGLEY and Janice Derr, Plaintiffs, v. R.J. WATSON, Assistant Director, Department of Human Resources, Administrator of Corrections; G.E. Sullivan, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution; Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary; and Department of Human Resources, Corrections Division, State of Oregon; Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Oregon |
J. Bradford Shiley, Portland, Or., Alice L. Dale, Or. Public Employes Union, Salem, Or., for plaintiffs.
Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., William F. Hoelscher, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, Or., for defendants.
Defendant State of Oregon has moved for a partial summary judgment asking the court to rule on two limited issues: (1) whether male prisoners in the state correctional institutions have state and/or federal constitutional rights to freedom from clothed "pat-down" frisk searches, and/or visual observations in states of undress, by female Correctional Officer Guards, and if so, (2) whether such constitutional rights constitute a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which would permit the state to employ "males only" in a certain number of guard positions having duties which cannot be accommodated to exclude "pat-down" frisk searches and visual observation of prisoners in states of undress.
All of the parties agree that after the court has enunciated the extent of the male prisoners' constitutional rights and the standing of those rights as BFOQ under Title VII, that settlement negotiations can resolve most of the remaining disputes.
The parties have filed a "Stipulation of Fact;" the defendants have submitted the Affidavit of Dr. Lois Shawver; and both parties have asked the court to assume that there are certain guard positions which cannot be accommodated to exclude female correctional officer guards from performing "pat-down" frisk searches and visual observation of male prisoners in states of undress.
A portion of the Affidavit of Dr. Shawver is incorporated in this opinion as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rushing v. Wayne County
...of the inmate's wife to other inmates and made derogatory remarks to the desk sergeant regarding his wife's anatomy); Bagley v. Watson, 579 F.Supp. 1099 (D.Or., 1983) (clothed pat-down frisk searches and visual observation of male inmates by female guards does not violate an inmate's right ......
-
Kirk v. Board of Educ. of Bremen Community High School Dist., No. 228, Cook County, Ill.
...unless female nurse was also present where male nurse was assigned), vacated as moot, 671 F.2d 1100 (8th Cir.1982) with Bagley v. Watson, 579 F.Supp. 1099 (D.Or.1983) (preference of male inmates that searches be conducted by male guards not sufficient to establish BFOQ defense to charge tha......
-
Greiner v. City of Champlin
...Smith v. Fairman, 678 F.2d 52 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 907, 103 S.Ct. 1879, 76 L.Ed.2d 810 (1983); Bagley v. Watson, 579 F.Supp. 1099, 1103 (D.Ore.1983). Thus, Greiner must present evidence that the search was somehow not routine. Greiner's deposition testimony states only tha......
-
Torres v. Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Social Services
...male inmates (including their anal-genital areas) and visual observations of male inmates in various states of undress. Bagley v. Watson, 579 F.Supp. 1099 (D.Or.1983). The court relied on the reasoning expressed by Justice Marshall in the following quote from his dissent in Dothard, 433 U.S......
-
An Assessment of Personnel Processes Pertaining to Women in a Traditionally Male Dominated Occupation: Affirmative Action Policies in Prisons and Jails
...and Misapplications of Social Research: The Case of Female Guards in Men’s Prisons." Criminology 22:441-560. Bagley v. Watson, 579 F. Supp. 1099 (D.C. Ore. Berl v. Westchester County, 849 F. 2d. 712 (2nd Cir. 1980). Caywood, Tom (1988) "Female Guards and Male Inmates: Is There a Clash of Co......