Bailey v. Anchor Packaging, 99-4272
| Decision Date | 14 June 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-4272,99-4272 |
| Citation | 216 F.3d 720 |
| Parties | (8th Cir. 2000) CRYSTALLINE S. BAILEY, APPELLANT, v. ANCHOR PACKAGING, ETC., APPELLEE. Submitted: |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Before Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges, and Panner, 1 District Judge.
Plaintiff Crystalline S. Bailey appeals the district court's 2 grant of summary judgment for defendant Anchor Packaging on plaintiff's employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the matter de novo and conclude that the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to Bailey, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Treanor v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 200 F.3d 570, 573 (8th Cir. 2000). The district court correctly ruled that defendant took prompt and appropriate remedial action after plaintiff complained that a co-worker had sexually harassed her. See Scusa v. Nestle U.S.A. Co., 181 F.3d 958, 967 (8th Cir. 1999).
We affirm the judgment of the district court.
1. The Honorable Owen M. Panner, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.
2. The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McCurdy v. Arkansas State Police, 03-3058.
...against it is bottomed on acts committed by a plaintiff's co-worker rather than a supervisor. See e.g., Bailey v. Anchor Packaging, 216 F.3d 720, 720 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam). But that is not this case. The present case was tried, at least partly, on the theory that Mr. Stillwell was Ms.......
- P.A.C.E. v. Kansas City Missouri School Dist.
-
Moisant v. Air Midwest, Inc., 01-2617.
...against it is bottomed on acts committed by a plaintiff's co-worker rather than by a supervisor. See e.g., Bailey v. Anchor Packaging, 216 F.3d 720, 720 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam). But that is not this case. The present case was tried, at least partly, on the theory that Mr. Stillwell was ......
-
Robinson v. Valmont Industries
...and corrective actions, the district court's award of summary judgment in favor of Valmont was correct. See Bailey v. Anchor Packaging, 216 F.3d 720, 720 (8th Cir. 2000) (affirming grant of summary judgment when employer initiated prompt and appropriate remedial action after employee lodged......