Bailey v. Richardson

Docket NumberSCDB 1950-114,49.
Decision Date30 April 1951
Citation341 U.S. 918,95 L. Ed. 2d 1352,71 S. Ct. 669,1951 U.S. LEXIS 1926
PartiesBAILEY v. RICHARDSON ET AL.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Certiorari, 339 U. S. 977, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Thurman Arnold and Paul A. Porter argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Abe Fortas and Milton V. Freeman. Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Morison, James L. Morrisson and Samuel D. Slade.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 books & journal articles
  • Designating the Dangerous: from Blacklists to Watch Lists
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 30-01, September 2006
    • Invalid date
    ...note 60, at 131. 71. Bailey v. Richardson, 182 F.2d 46, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1950) (Edgerton, J., dissenting), aff'd by an equally divided court, 341 U.S. 918 72. Id. at 66. 73. See Michael E. Parrish, Review Essay: Soviet Espionage and the Cold War, 25 Diplomatic Hist. 105 (2001) (reviewing eleve......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT