Baker Hotel of Dallas v. Rogers

CourtTexas Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPer Curiam
CitationBaker Hotel of Dallas v. Rogers, 160 S.W.2d 522 (Tex. 1942)
Decision Date04 March 1942
Docket NumberNo. 26196.,26196.
PartiesBAKER HOTEL OF DALLAS, Inc., v. ROGERS.

Callaway & Reed, O. D. Montgomery, and Frank C. Brooks, all of Dallas, for plaintiffs in error.

W. Glenn Polk, of Dallas, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion in this case of the Court of Civil Appeals is reported at 157 S.W.2d 940. We refer to that opinion for full statement of the facts and issues.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals holds that where appellant did not complain that a verdict for appellee was excessive, the trial court's alleged error in its charge on measure of damages, on ground that charge permitted recovery by appellee for physical pain appellee might suffer in the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Younger Bros. v. Marino
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 21, 1946
    ... ... Corp. v. McCall, Tex.Civ.App., 195 S.W.2d 585; Baker Hotel v. Rogers, Tex.Civ.App., 157 S.W.2d 940, application for writ of ... discussing a similar contention, based upon a like occurrence, the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals, in the recent case of Associated Employers Lloyds ... ...
  • Lone Star Gas Co. v. Childress
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 1945
    ... ... Collins, and J. L. Toone, all of Dallas, for appellant ...         Turner & Seaberry, of Eastland, for ... v. Manes, Tex.Com.App., 254 S.W. 929, point 10, p. 932. See also: Baker ... 929, point 10, p. 932. See also: Baker Hotel ... 929, point 10, p. 932. See also: Baker Hotel v. Rogers ... ...
  • Pierce v. City of Stephenville
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 21, 1947
    ... ... That, although they had leased rooms for a studio at a hotel in Stephenville for a year, they paid therefor by the month; that they ... Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 435, 448. Baker e. Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 435, 448. Baker Hotel of Dallas ... Baker Hotel of Dallas v. Rogers ... ...
  • Cullinan v. Hare
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 26, 1944
    ...what excess amount enters into the verdict, the error cannot be corrected and a new trial must be awarded. Baker Hotel of Dallas, Inc., v. Rogers, 138 Tex. 398, 160 S.W.2d 522; City of Dallas v. Jones, 93 Tex. 38, 49 S.W. 577, 53 S.W. 377; Stedman Fruit Co. v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W.2d......
  • Get Started for Free