Baker v. Cities Serv. Oil Co.
Decision Date | 28 December 1943 |
Docket Number | Gen. No. 9924. |
Citation | 52 N.E.2d 284,321 Ill.App. 142 |
Parties | BAKER v. CITIES SERVICE OIL CO. ET AL. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, DeKalb County; Harry W. McEwen, Judge.
Action by Eugene Baker, a minor, by Robert Baker, his next friend, against Cities Service Oil Company and another for injuries sustained when plaintiff was struck by an automobile. From a judgment for defendants after motion to dismiss was granted, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
George Spitz, of DeKalb, for appellant.
Sears, O'Brien & Streit, of Aurora, for appellees.
This is an action by appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. The complaint alleged that a gasoline truck belonging to appellees, was parked on 9th street in the city of DeKalb, for the purpose of unloading gasoline to underground storage tanks at a filling station there located; and that while the truck was so parked, appellant, age five, in company with another small child, and while crossing 9th street, was struck by a passing car, as he came from behind the truck.
Appellees filed their motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it failed to allege a cause of action against them, and alleged no act or acts on their part which proximately caused the injury complained of. The motion to dismiss was granted. Appellant elected to stand by the pleadings, and judgment was entered for appellees.
The sole question involved in this appeal appears to be whether the negligence charged was the proximate cause of the injury. It is urged by appellees that no facts are alleged in the complaint constituting negligence and that the presence of the truck upon the street was merely a condition and not the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries.
[1] Similar legal situations respecting liability such as involved in this suit are numerous and general in application. As stated in Briske v. Village of Burnham, 379 Ill. 193, on page 199, 39 N.E.2d 976, on page 979, “If a negligent act or omission does nothing more than furnish a condition making an injury possible, and such condition, by the subsequent independent act of a third person, causes an injury, the two acts are not concurrent and the existence of the condition is not the proximate cause of the injury.” Also see Merlo v. Public Service Co., 381 Ill. 300, 45 N.E.2d 665. Many cases involving this rule will be found referred to in the two above opinions.
The needs of society are fluid...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
First Springfield Bank and Trust v. Galman
...conflicting results in cases where a parked vehicle obscured the view or path of others. Compare Baker v. Cities Service Oil Co., 321 Ill.App. 142, 143-44, 52 N.E.2d 284, 284-85 (1943) (parked vehicle is a mere condition, not a cause of accident), and Walker v. Illinois Commercial Telephone......
-
Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.
...504, 134 S.W.2d 898, Id., 24 Tenn.App. 36, 139 S.W.2d 256; Falk v. Finkelman, 268 Mass. 524, 168 N.E. 89; Baker v. Cities Service Oil Co., 321 Ill.App. 142, 52 N.E.2d 284; Schultz v. Brogan, 251 Wis. 390, 29 N.W.2d 719; Painter v. Bewley Furniture Co., La.App., 1940, 195 So. 70; Kline v. Mo......
-
Domitz v. Springfield Bottlers
... ... 580; Walker et ux. v. Illinois Tel ... Co., 315 Ill.App. 553, 43 N.E.2d 412; Baker v ... Cities Service Oil Co., 321 Ill.App. 142, 52 N.E.2d 284; ... Vassia v. Highland Dairy ... ...
-
Jarosh v. Van Meter
...98 N.J.L. 730, 119 A. 273; DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co., Inc., 380 Pa. 484, 112 A.2d 372; Baker v. Cities Service Oil Co., 321 Ill.App. 142, 52 N.E.2d 284. As stated in Powers v. Standard Oil Co., supra: 'In such a situation cause necessarily comprehends an efficient oper......