Baker v. Cuomo, s. 565
| Decision Date | 10 October 1995 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 565,D,1135-1137,s. 565 |
| Citation | 67 F.3d 39 |
| Parties | Theodore BAKER, Raymond Strawder, Yohannes Jackson, Mark A. Simon and Malcolm Nelson, Plaintiffs, Milton Goodman, Anthony Canady, Tyrone Sanchez and Richard Jackson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mario CUOMO, Governor of the State of New York, Thomas A. Coughlin, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees. ockets 94-2163, 94-2164, 94-2165 and 94-2176. . Petition for Rehearing, |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Before: NEWMAN, Chief Judge, KEARSE, MINER, ALTIMARI, MAHONEY, WALKER, McLAUGHLIN, JACOBS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. *
Suggestion for rehearing in banc of an appeal of a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Vincent L. Broderick, Judge) dismissing a complaint of state prisoners alleging denial of voting rights. Panel remanded, and denied petition for rehearing, Baker v. Cuomo, 58 F.3d 814 (2d Cir.1995). Rehearing in banc ordered.
The Court orders a rehearing in banc, limited to the issue of the applicability of the Voting Rights Act. See Baker v. Cuomo, 58 F.3d 814 (2d Cir.1995).
* Circuit Judges Ralph K. Winter, Pierre N. Leval, Guido Calabresi, and Jose A. Cabranes recused themselves.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Muntaqim v. Coombe
...The in banc Court granted the defendants' petition for rehearing in banc only with respect to the § 1973 claims. See Baker v. Cuomo, 67 F.3d 39 (2d Cir.1995) (in banc). 10. Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides in relevant part that "[n]o State shall ... deny to any person within i......
- Yushuvayev v. U.S., 07-CV-1338.
-
Baker v. Pataki
...("Baker III "). This Court granted rehearing in banc only with respect to plaintiffs-appellants' § 1973 claims. See Baker v. Cuomo, 67 F.3d 39 (2d Cir.1995) ("Baker IV "). Fifteen judges were potentially eligible to sit on the in banc court: the thirteen active judges of the court and the t......
- Pena v. U.S., S8 96 CR. 402(PKL).