Baker v. Estate of Smith
Decision Date | 20 May 1929 |
Citation | 18 S.W.2d 147,223 Mo.App. 1234,226 Mo.App. 510 |
Parties | MARY B. BAKER, APPELLANT, v. ESTATE OF MARTHA B. SMITH, RESPONDENT |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County.--Hon. L. A Vories, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Reversed and remanded.
German Hull & German and Shultz & Owen for appellant.
Groves Watkins & Wanger for respondent.
Trimble, P. J., absent.
This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court of Buchanan county, Missouri, whereby the trial court sustained a motion to dismiss the appellant's appeal from an order of the probate court of that county. The order of the probate court overruled appellant's motion to dismiss the proceedings in the matter of Martha B. Smith, a person of unsound mind.
Clark H. Smith and Martha B. Baker were married in Los Angeles, California on November 1, 1899. A few months after the marriage they established their home in Kansas City, Missouri. In 1917, Mrs. Smith was stricken with a malady which resulted in the loss of her reason. She was placed by her husband in various sanitariums and finally in 1920, she was placed in State Asylum No. 2, for the insane in St. Joseph, Missouri, where she has ever since been kept as a patient. During the time that Mrs. Smith has been a patient in the asylum at St. Joseph, Clark H. Smith has maintained his residence in Kansas City, Missouri. On August 13, 1923, the husband filed in the probate court of Buchanan county a verified information in which it was alleged that Martha B. Smith is a resident of Buchanan county, is possessed of property, and is a person of unsound mind and incapable of managing her own affairs. On the day that the information was filed the probate court made an order that notice issue to Martha B. Smith as required by law, that the cause be taken up for hearing on the 18th day of August, 1923, and that a jury be summoned to hear the cause. The notice was issued and the sheriff's return recited that it was served on the 13th day of August, 1923, by delivering a true copy to Martha B. Smith and by delivering a true copy to Dr. Thompson, superintendent of State Hospital No. 2. On the 16th day of August, 1923, the clerk of probate issued a jury summons, and the sheriff's return thereon appears as follows:
A pencil line had been run through the names of Fred Sanborn, J. J. Hanley and J. A. Kabka on the sheriff's return at the time of the trial in the circuit court, and numerals appeared before twelve names.
On August 18, 1923, the probate court again made an order that a jury summons issue to the sheriff of Buchanan county, Missouri, for eighteen jurors, and on that day the court entered of record an order which is as follows:
"Now here comes the sheriff of Buchanan county, Missouri, and returns notice to Martha B. Smith, showing proper service.
Now here it is ordered by the court that Homer King be and is hereby appointed counsel for said Martha B. Smith during the hearing on the information as to her alleged insanity.
"It is therefore adjudged by the court that Martha B. Smith is a person of unsound mind and incapable of managing her own affairs, and it is ordered and adjudged that Clark H. Smith be and is hereby appointed guardian of the said Martha B. Smith, insane, subject to giving bond unto the State of Missouri, in the sum of $ 6000, conditioned as required by law."
Therefore, Clark H. Smith qualified, filed an inventory, and made annual settlements. In 1927, the court made an order by which the husband was removed as guardian on the ground that he was a nonresident of the State of Missouri and had been divorced from his ward. The court then appointed one John J. Downey of St. Joseph, Missouri, as the husband's successor, who in due time qualified and who is now the acting guardian of Martha B. Smith.
Plaintiff filed a motion in the probate court of Buchanan county which is as follows:
Thereafter and on January 14, 1928, a hearing was had on this motion and the probate court entered of record an order in which it was recited that when the information alleging the insanity of Martha B. Smith was filed, and when Martha B. Smith was served with notice by the sheriff, and when the information was tried before a jury, the said Martha B. Smith, was in the county of Buchanan and was served with notice by the sheriff, and that the court obtained jurisdiction of the subject-matter in the case and full jurisdiction over Martha B. Smith; that said Mary B. Baker who filed the motion had no interest in the estate of Martha B. Smith, and therefore had no right to maintain the motion and that the motion was overruled. From this order Mary B. Baker appealed and John J. Downey, as guardian, filed in the circuit court a motion to dismiss the appeal, and as grounds therefor alleged as follows:
Said motion was set down for hearing and when the motion came on to be heard the circuit judge made the following statement:
"Let the record show that the evidence heard in this case applies with what bearing it may have upon either the motion or the merits of the case."
Upon the hearing in the circuit court it was shown that Mary B. Baker, who filed the motion in the probate court, and who appealed to the circuit court was the sister of Martha B. Smith, a person of unsound mind; that she had been appointed guardian of the person and estate of Martha B. Smith by the probate court of Jackson county, shortly before she filed the motion in the probate court of Buchanan county. The defendant John J. Downey introduced evidence from which it appears without contradiction that Martha B. Smith's husband was a resident of Jackson county, at the time she was incarcerated in the asylum in Buchanan county; that she was insane at the time she was placed in the asylum and has been of unsound mind ever since. The husband himself was put upon the stand and testified that he was then and ever since has been a resident of Jackson county, and he testified that he had signed the information wherein it was alleged that his wife was a resident of Buchanan county, because he was advised by counsel that this was necessary in order to secure the inquisition upon the question of his wife's sanity. At the close of the evidence the court entered an order which is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Wilkerson v. Skinker
... ... 17 S.W.2d 935; Ellis v. Elkins, 130 Mo. 90, 30 S.W ... 333; State ex rel. Scarritt Estate v. Johnson, 303 ... Mo. 664, 262 S.W. 373. (e) Permanent writ will be granted ... where ... 1929; Secs. 282, 2436, R ... S. 1919; In re McMenamy's Guardianship, 270 S.W ... 668; Baker v. Smith's Estate, 18 S.W.2d 151; ... State ex rel. Smith v. Williams, 275 S.W. 535; ... In ... ...
-
Beil v. Gaertner
... ... 617 Mary M. Beil v. Clifford W. Gaertner, Guardian of the Person and Estate of Mary M. Beil; Clifford W. Gaertner and Edith Gaertner, Appellants No. 39833 Supreme Court of ... Hamilton ... v. Henderson, 232 Mo.App. 1234, 117 S.W.2d 379; ... Baker v. Smith's Estate, 226 Mo.App. 510, 18 ... S.W.2d 147; State ex rel. Townsend v. Mueller, 330 ... ...
-
Ross v. Davis
... ... Stanley, 225 Mo. 525, 125 S.W. 475; ... Cross v. Gould, 131 Mo.App. 585, 110 S.W. 672; ... Smith v. Young, 136 Mo.App. 65, 117 S.W. 628; ... State ex rel. Crabb v. American Surety Co., 66 ... v. Riley, ... 219 Mo. 667, 118 S.W. 647; Simms v. Thompson, 291 ... Mo. 493, 236 S.W. 876; Baker v. Smith Estate, 226 ... Mo.App. 510, 18 S.W.2d 147; State ex rel. Roberts, 116 S.W.2d ... 166 ... ...
-
Moberly v. Powell
... ... CHARLES POWELL AND W. W. WALKER, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF GUSTAV SCHOELLER, DECEASED, DEFENDANTS. CHARLES POWELL, RESPONDENT, v. W. W. WALKER, ... Castello, 35 Mo.App. 127; ... Bank of Monett v. Moulder, 53 Mo.App. 535; ... Thurman v. Smith, 39 S.W.2d 336. It is necessary to ... give an appeal bond in any case to stay the proceedings, ... Stat. Ann ... 1929, sec. 285, p. 181; In re Tannory (Mo. App.), 1 ... S.W.2d 189; Baker v. Smith's Estate (Mo. App.), ... 18 S.W.2d 147, 223 Mo.App. 1234.] ... It is ... ...