Baker v. McGinnis
| Decision Date | 01 July 1968 |
| Docket Number | 68 Civ. 2946. |
| Citation | 286 F. Supp. 280 |
| Parties | Wayne BAKER, Plaintiff, v. Paul D. McGINNIS, Commissioner of Correction of the State of New York, Defendant. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
On June 28, 1968 this Court granted plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis in the filing of his complaint against Leonard Rubenfeld, District Attorney of Westchester County, 68 Civ. 2622. In that action, plaintiff charged that he should have been treated as a narcotics addict under Civil commitment rather than Criminal commitment.
Plaintiff now challenges the jurisdiction of the Parole Board to confine him for parole violations. In support of his complaint, plaintiff asks the Court to interpret certain New York statutes relating to parole. While petitioner does not specifically state what remedy he is seeking, it appears that the complaint is intended as a means of obtaining his release from imprisonment.
Construction of State statutes is a function for State courts, not Federal courts, since the question of legislative intent does not present a Federal constitutional issue. Paterno v. Lyons, 334 U.S. 314, 318-319, 68 S.Ct. 1044, 92 L.Ed. 1409 (1948); Hebert v. State of Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 47 S.Ct. 103, 71 L.Ed. 270 (1926); United States ex rel. Good v. Rundle, 271 F.Supp. 948 (E.D.Pa.1967); United States ex rel. Morgan v. Wolfe, 232 F.Supp. 85 (S.D. N.Y.1964). Moreover, this Court has repeatedly held that State prisoners will not be permitted to circumvent the requirements of the Federal habeas corpus statutes by filing complaints under the Civil Rights Act, seeking in effect the same relief as would be available under habeas corpus. See Greene v. State of New York et al., 281 F.Supp. 579, at 581-582 (S.D.N.Y.1967). Plaintiff has not even attempted to show that he has even tried to correct any alleged wrongs in the State courts.
Accordingly, the Court is satisfied that this action is frivolous and forma pauperis is therefore denied. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
So ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States ex rel. Russell v. La Vallee
...68 S.Ct. 1044, 92 L.Ed. 1409 (1948); United States ex rel. Lloyd v. La Vallee, 304 F.Supp. 957, 958 (S.D.N.Y.1969); see Baker v. McGinnis, 286 F.Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y.1968); United States ex rel. Good v. Rundle, 271 F.Supp. 948, 949-950 (E.D.Pa.1967). 7 See note 1 supra. 8 See People v. Bailey......
-
Edwards v. Schmidt
...hearing); Greene v. State of New York, 281 F.Supp. 579 (S.D.N.Y. 1967) (additions to sentence upon parole violation); Baker v. McGinnis, 286 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (challenge, on state law grounds, to the jurisdiction of the parole board over parole revocation); Groppi v. Froehlich, 31......
-
Davis Const. Corp. v. Suffolk County
...an issue for the state courts since the question of legislative intent does not present a federal constitutional question (Baker v. McGinnis, 286 F.Supp. 280 ) and the federal courts will exercise ancillary jurisdiction only where the ancillary claim is logically related, in terms of factua......
-
Still v. Nichols, Misc. No. 312.
...W.D.Pa., 1966, 249 F.Supp. 923, aff'd 3 Cir., 368 F.2d 787, cert. denied 386 U.S. 977, 87 S.Ct. 1173, 18 L.Ed.2d 139; Baker v. McGinnis, S.D.N.Y., 1968, 286 F.Supp. 280. It has been held that the same dismissal must be ordered with respect to a claim for money damages. Greene v. New York, S......