Balducci v. Cutler
| Citation | 354 Pa. 436,47 A.2d 643 |
| Parties | Balducci v. Culter, Appellant |
| Decision Date | 25 June 1946 |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued April 12, 1946
Appeal, No. 7, Jan. T., 1946, from judgment of C.P Lackawanna Co., March T., 1938, No. 483, in case of Angelina Balducci v. Myer Cutler. Judgment reversed.
Trespass for wrongful death. Before LITTLE, P.J., specially presiding.
Verdict for plaintiff in amount of $5,552 against defendant and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.
Judgment reversed and judgment is here entered for appellant.
Irving L. Epstein , for appellant.
Joseph J. Cimino , for appellee.
Before MAXEY, C.J., DREW, LINN, STERN, PATTERSON, STEARNE and JONES JJ.
Angelina Balducci, appellee, brought this trespass action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, Tito Balducci, who was fatally injured as a result of being struck by an automobile operated by Myer Cutler, appellant. A motion for compulsory nonsuit and a point for binding instructions in appellant's favor were refused. The case was submitted to the jury which returned a verdict for appellee in the sum of $5,552. Cutler's motion for judgment non obstante veredicto was refused, and he appealed.
The accident occurred at 7:00 P.M., on February 22, 1937, in the vicinity of the intersection of Pittston Avenue and Ripple Street, Scranton, Pennsylvania. Pittston Avenue runs north and south and contains two sets of parallel trolley tracks. Ripple Street, which runs east and west, intersects and runs out right angles to Pittston Avenue. Martin Sabatini, only witness to how the accident occurred, had alighted from a southbound trolley car at the northwest corner of the intersection. While waiting for the southbound traffic to pass, the witness observed "a man" whom he thought he recognized as his cousin, on the opposite or easterly side of the street, 15 to 20 feet north of the intersection and 4 or 5 feet from the curb. The man, according to the witness, was standing in the cartway at this point or "just about stepping along, sort of waiting to cross the street, and edging over," "walking more southerly than he would be westerly." After about a minute the witness realized that the man was not his cousin, took his gaze from the man, and had started to cross from the northwest to the northeast corner of the intersection when he observed appellant's automobile a block away to the south, approaching the intersection at an estimated speed of 45 miles per hour. "About the same second" the automobile reached a point opposite him the witness heard a "bump" and "saw a body up over the hood" on the right-hand side of the automobile. The body fell to the ground and appellant's automobile swerved to the left, coming to a stop thirty-five feet away. The witness walked over to the body and recognized it as the unconscious form of Tito Balducci. Balducci was removed to a hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival.
Sabatini was not asked nor did he testify whether the man he saw 15 to 20 feet north of the intersection and 4 to 5 feet from the easterly curb was Balducci; be could not testify to the man's movements in the interval between the time he saw him at that point and the impact; and he was unable to state where Balducci was standing when he was struck, or for what length of time he had been standing in that position. The witness stated that from the moment he first observed appellant's automobile a block away his gaze was continuously fixed on the automobile; that the automobile was not zigzagging but approached in a straight line, with its left wheels riding the center of the easterly or northbound set of trolley tracks. The headlights of the automobile were on and there was a lighted street lamp at the...
To continue reading
Request your trial