Balip Automotive Repairs v. Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 21 May 1951 |
| Docket Number | No. A--66,A--66 |
| Citation | Balip Automotive Repairs v. Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co., 81 A.2d 9, 7 N.J. 152 (N.J. 1951) |
| Parties | BALIP AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS, Inc., v. ATLANTIC CASUALTY INS. CO. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Aaron Gordon, Jersey City, argued the cause for appellant(Louis Steisel, Jersey City, Attorney).
Harry Green, Newark, argued the cause for respondent.
The record indicates the testimony in question was willfully and purposely false and substantially affected the results.
It would manifestly be unjust to permit the judgment to stand under these circumstances.
We are in accord with the determination made by the Appellate Division8 N.J.Super. 238, 73 A.2d 848, and subscribe to the reasons expressed in its opinion.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON--7.
For reversal: None.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Hodgson v. Applegate
...see State v. Bunk, supra; (c) fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co., 7 N.J. 152, 81 A.2d 9 (1951); Ehnes v. King, 41 N.J.Super. 429, 125 A.2d 349 (App.Div.1956), and see Shammas v. Shammas, supra; (d) ......
-
Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.
...other good reason the failure to use diligence is in all the circumstances not a bar to relief. Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co., supra [7 N.J. 152, 81 A.2d 9 (1959) ]. * * * Willis v. Willis, 93 Idaho 261, at 264-65, 460 P.2d 396, at 399-400 (emphasis added). Tu......
-
Shammas v. Shammas
...* * (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic) * * * of an adverse party'. Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc., v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co., 7 N.J. 152, 81 A.2d 9 (1951), affirming, Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc., v. Schroeder, 8 N.J.Super. 238, 73 A.2d 848 (App.Div.1950......
-
Mitchell's Contracting Serv., LLC v. Gleason
... ... " " American Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. v. Hughes , 624 So.2d 1362, 136667 (Ala ... ...
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Vermont. Practice Text
...statute but has never been invoked by the state. 88 80. Ill. Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977). 81. Elkins v. Microsoft Corp., 81 A.2d 9 (Vt. 2002); Wright v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc., 989 A.2d 539 (Vt. 2009). 82. 915 A.2d 1298 (Vt. 2006). 83. 915 A.2d at 1304. 84. Id . 85. VT. STAT. ......
-
Vermont
...365 U.S. 127 (1961). 61. 2000 Vt. Acts & Resolves 65. 62. Ill. Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977). 63. Elkins v. Microsoft Corp., 81 A.2d 9 (Vt. 2002). 64. 915 A.2d 1298 (Vt. 2006). 65. Id . at 1304. 66. Id . 67. VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 9, § 2458(a). Vermont 49-10 Attorney General. 68 T......