Ball v. Coyle
Decision Date | 10 February 1925 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 14860 |
Citation | 233 P. 750,1925 OK 101,108 Okla. 30 |
Parties | BALL et al. v. COYLE. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Error from District Court, Grady County; Will Linn, Judge.
Action by John Coyle against J. F. Ball and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Reversed.
¶0 1. Covenants--Rights Conveyed--Action for Breach.
Covenants must express the purpose of the parties thereto. They affect the estate, whatever it may be, or contracted to be, in the hand of successors to the title of the covenators. When breached, they confer rights of action upon the person the same as a breach of any other contractual obligation.
2. Oil and Gas--Assignment of Lease--Covenants as to Incumbrances--Invalidation of Lease by Foreclosure of Mortgage on Land.
Where the lessee takes an oil and gas lease upon land subject to a mortgage, it is defeasible by the foreclosure of the mortgage, and the assignee under an assignment from the lessee, the provisions of which assignment go no further than to covenant that lessee is the lawful owner of the lease and rights and interest thereunder, and the personal property thereon, and same is free from incumbrance, takes only the interest the lessee had, and such covenant cannot be extended so as to become a guaranty of the title to the land covered by the lease, as against the mortgage. The assignee cannot recover the price paid for the lease by merely pleading the alleged breach of the covenant in the assignment, and that by the foreclosure of the mortgage his lease was stricken down.
Bond, Melton & Melton, for plaintiffs in error.
Bailey & Hammerly, for defendant in error.
¶1 The appeal herein is from a judgment in the sum of $ 450 rendered in favor of one John Coyle, against J. F. Ball and L. L. Laws. The cause of action pleaded by the plaintiff, Coyle, against the defendants, Ball and Laws, was for breach of covenant contained in an assignment by which the defendants' interest in an oil and gas mining lease was assigned to Coyle, and for which Coyle paid the sum recovered. The clause in the assignment is as follows:
"* * * That they are the lawful owners of said lease and rights and interest thereunder, and of the personal property thereon or used in connection therewith; that the undersigned have good right to sell and convey the same, and that the said rights, interest and property are free and clear of all liens and incumbrances, and that all rentals and royalties due and payable thereunder have been duly paid."
¶2 The lease was made by the landowner in March, 1919. The assignment by the defendants containing said clause was executed April 28, 1919. Prior to the execution of the lease by the landowner, a mortgage had been executed by him, and was foreclosed by the Oklahoma National Bank of Chickasha in 1920, the sale at foreclosure divesting the assignee, Coyle, of his lease. The only question is whether or not the covenants in that part of the assignment above quoted extended to a warranty of the title to the land on which the lease was executed, or whether the same was only as to the assignors' ownership and their right, title, and interest in and to the lease and the personal property located thereon. The only assignments of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
FINANCE & INV. CO., LTD. v. UMA, LLC
...it confers the same right of action as for any other contract." Russell, 1998 OK CIV APP 135 at ¶ 7, 964 P.2d at 234 (citing Ball v. Coyle, 1925 OK 101, 108 Okla. 30, 233 P. ¶ 9 Although the Russell court applied a five-year statute of limitations to the breach of covenant claim, the fiftee......
-
Russell v. Williams
...the nature of a contract and when a covenant is breached it confers the same right of action as for any other contract. Ball v. Coyle, 108 Okla. 30, 233 P. 750 (1925). The statute of limitations for breach of contract is five years. 12 O.S.1991 § 95(1); Mounts v. Parker, 1986 OK 66, 727 P.2......
-
VRANESEVICH v. CRAFT, 106
...an injunction requiring the defendant to remove the dirt fill from the plaintiff's property. 4The Russell opinion cites Ball v. Coyle, 1925 OK 101, 233 P. 750, for this proposition. The Court in Ball held that a covenant in an assignment of an oil and gas lease stating that the sellers had ......
- Okla. City v. Harper, Case Number: 32515