Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha
Decision Date | 02 February 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 34971,34971 |
Citation | 173 Neb. 229,113 N.W.2d 486 |
Parties | The BALLANTYNE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee, v. The CITY OF OMAHA, a municipal corporation, Appellant. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Syllabus By The Court
1. Section 25-852, R.R.S.1943, provides in part that the court may, either before of after judgment, in furtherance of justice, and on such terms as may be proper, amend any proceeding.
2. The term "proceeding" as used in the above section of the statutes includes filing of an appeal bond, and the right to amend such bond is within the purview of the statute.
3. Section 25-853, R.R.S.1943, provides that the court in every stage of an action must disregard any error or defect in the proceedings which does not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party; and no judgment shall be reversed or afflicted by reason of such error or defect.
4. The right to amend an appeal bond is within the purview of the above-cited section of the statutes.
5. In the absence of a statute or agreement to the contrary, the removal expenses of a lessee, including injury to personal property, caused by said removal, from a leasehold or fee in land, where there is an entire taking of the whole of the condemnee's estate under the sovereign power of eminent domain, cannot be considered as an element of damage, since such loss is not a taking of property.
6. The measure of damages in the taking or injury of a leasehold is the difference between the rental value of the remainder of the term and the rent reserved in the lease.
7. If a leasehold interest is taken, or injured, the lessee is entitled to a sum which will restore the money loss consequent to the taking or injury.
8. This consists generally of the fair market value of the leasehold or unexpired term of the lease, and is said to be the difference between the rental value of the remainder of the term and the rent reserved in the lease.
9. Where the rent reserved equals or exceeds the rental value, the lessee has suffered no loss and cannot recover.
Herbert M. Fitle, Bernard E. Vinardi, Irving B. Epstein, Frederick A. Brown, Benjamin M. Wall, Edward M. Stein, Steven J. Lustgarten, Omaha, for appellant.
Seymour L. Smith, Einar Viren, Omaha, for appellee.
Heard before CARTER, MESSMORE, YEAGER, SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, and BROWER, JJ.
The plaintiff and claimant, The Ballantyne Company, a corporation, appealed to the district court for Douglas County from the award of the appraisers duly appointed by the city council of the City of Omaha in a condemnation action allowing said plaintiff no damages.
The Ballantyne Company, plaintiff, is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Nebraska. The City of Omaha, defendant, is a city of the metropolitan class by virtue of the laws of the State of Nebraska. We will refer to The Ballantyne Company, a corporation, as the plaintiff or the company, to the City of Omaha as the defendant or, on some occasions, as the city, and to the other parties involved in this cause by their names.
The condemnation proceedings instituted by the city were for the purpose of obtaining certain private property upon which to construct a municipal auditorium.
It was stipulated by the parties that this cause be tried to the court without a jury.
The trial court found generally for the plaintiff and against the defendant, and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover from the defendant the sum of $45,871.26. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the findings, in the amount of $45,871.26, with lawful interest from the date of the judgment, and the costs of the action.
The defendant filed a motion for new trial which was overruled. The defendant perfected appeal to this court.
The plaintiff's amended petition alleged in substance that the plaintiff was the lessee of a tract of land being acquired by the defendant; that the plaintiff sustained damages by reason of the taking of the leasehold and as a consequence suffered expenses of removal, moving, and relocating trade fixtures; and that the plaintiff required a special type of building for its business and suffered expense of making a new building suitable for its purpose, and claimed damages in the amount of $69,257.96, plus interest at 6 percent per annum from and after July 10, 1951.
The answer of the city admitted that the city had instituted condemnation proceedings. The answer alleged that the plaintiff was not entitled to damages; that the finding on the part of appraisers allowing no damages to the plaintiff was legal and just; and that the plaintiff failed to perfect its appeal to the district court by reason of the filing of a faulty bond with the city clerk of the city of Omaha.
The defendant assigns as error that the trial court was without jurisdiction; that the judgment is contrary to law and to the evidence; and that there was error of law occurring at the trial.
The defendant contends that the appeal bond in this case was jurisdictional.
The appeal bond filed with the city clerk of the city of Omaha was an undertaking in the specific amount of $200. The above bond was filed with the city clerk, and the surety approved by the city clerk July 12, 1951. On December 19, 1956, the plaintiff filed a motion asking leave to file an additional appeal bond, which was allowed. The additional appeal bond provided to pay all costs adjudged against the plaintiff.
Section 14-813, R.R.S.1943, provides in part:
In the case of Creighton University v. City of Omaha, 91 Neb. 486, 136 N.W. 829, it was said:
Section 25-852, R.R.S.1943, provides in part:
The term 'proceeding' as used in the statute includes filing of appeal bond, and the right to amend such bond is within the purview of the statute. See In re Estate of Kothe, 131 Neb. 780, 270 N.W. 117. In the cited case it was said: 'This court has frequently held that where a bond is given, even if defective, still the court has obtained jurisdiction, and that the proper procedure is for the adverse party to move to compel the appellant to give a proper bond in an amount and condition as required by law; * * *.'
Section 25-853, R.R.S.1943, provides: 'The court in every stage of an action must disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which does not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party; and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.'
The right to amend an appeal bond is within the purview of the statute. See In re Estate of Hoagland, 128 Neb. 219, 258 N.W. 538. In the cited case the court said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Balog v. State, Dept. of Roads
...is the difference between the rental value of the remainder of the term and the rent reserved in the lease. Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486. If the rent reserved equals or exceeds the rental value, the lessee suffers no loss and cannot recover. Where the entire......
-
Pieper v. City of Scottsbluff
...The contention of the city is that by the cases of James Poultry Co. v. City of Nebraska City, supra, and Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486, the rule announced therein prohibits showing anticipated loss of future profits, therefore Stricker's testimony was errone......
-
State Dept. of Roads v. Dillon
...rent payments have abated together. This general rule was followed last year by this court in the recent case of Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486, which case in turn cited Platte Valley Public Power & Irr. Dist. v. Armstrong, 159 Neb. 609, 68 N.W.2d 200, and oth......
-
City of Manhattan v. Eriksen, 45442
...of removing his personal property from the premises. (State ex rel. Willey v. Chun, 91 Ariz. 317, 372 P.2d 324; Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486; Williams v. State Highway Commission, 252 N.C. 141, 113 S.E.2d 263; Housing Authority v. Kosydor, 17 Ill.2d 602, 162......
-
Neb. Const. art. I § I-21 Private Property Compensated For
...N.W.2d 107 (1962). Constitutional provision does not change measure of damages in taking of leasehold. Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486 Agreement by city to construct median and barrier curbs in street did not violate this section. Hillerege v. City of Scottsblu......
-
§ I-21. Private Property Compensated For
...N.W.2d 107 (1962). Constitutional provision does not change measure of damages in taking of leasehold. Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486 Agreement by city to construct median and barrier curbs in street did not violate this section. Hillerege v. City of Scottsblu......
-
Neb. Const. art. I § I-21 Private Property Compensated For
...N.W.2d 107 (1962). Constitutional provision does not change measure of damages in taking of leasehold. Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486 Agreement by city to construct median and barrier curbs in street did not violate this section. Hillerege v. City of Scottsblu......
-
Neb. Const. art. I § I-21 Private Property Compensated For
...N.W.2d 107 (1962). Constitutional provision does not change measure of damages in taking of leasehold. Ballantyne Co. v. City of Omaha, 173 Neb. 229, 113 N.W.2d 486 Agreement by city to construct median and barrier curbs in street did not violate this section. Hillerege v. City of Scottsblu......