Ballard v. New York Etc. R. Co
| Decision Date | 01 January 1887 |
| Docket Number | 411 |
| Parties | JENNIE BALLARD v. NEW YORK ETC. R. CO |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Argued April 29, 1889
ERROR TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CRAWFORD COUNTY.
No. 411 January Term 1887, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 51 May Term 1885, C.P.
On March 9, 1885, Jennie Ballard, for herself and for her minor children, Lenore A. Ballard and Mary I. Ballard, brought an action in case against the New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company, to recover damages for injuries resulting in the death of her husband, A. L. Ballard, and alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant.
At the trial on February 28, 1887, the plaintiff's case was to this effects.
A. L Ballard at the time of his death was a locomotive engineer in the employ of the defendant. About five o'clock on the morning of December 15, 1884, when it was still dark, he was seen upon the seal at the right side of the locomotive cab while the train was going west. When next seen, he was lying on the floor of the cab on his back, face upwards, with his head near the feet of the brakeman, and his skull fractured.
The accident occurred near the east end of a siding. On this siding, the evening before, there was a box car, some 275 feet from the switch. On the following morning, this car was near the switch, at the east end of the car, at a point where the rails of the side track were four feet eight inches from the rails of the main track. There was no evidence as to how the car came to be in this position.
The track of the siding was nearly on a level, and the evidence showed that an ordinary freight car projects over the rails about one foot and ten inches. As to how far a locomotive cab thus projects, did not clearly appear.
A. W Brown, a witness called for the plaintiff, was sworn and testified:
Q. You may state if you have worked considerable on the railroad and in what position? A. I have been employed about seven years as a fireman. Q. You may state if you visited this locality at the instance of the plaintiff in this case the other day? A. I did; I was up there and looked over the ground. Q. State if you examined the siding there? A. I did. Q. You may state if you are acquainted with a device called a safety-switch? A. I am. Q. Explain to the jury what that device is for? A. A safety-switch is for cars thrown in on a side track; in case they get away, or anything of the sort, they would run off the track without running on to the main line. Q. What causes the moving of cars on the siding on to the main track? A. There are different causes; the wind will move a car occasionally; an engine or train backing in or pulling in will move cars.
The following offer was then...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Boyd v. Harris
...v. B. & O.R.R., 11 A. 659; Lovejoy v. Boston & Lowell R.R., 125 Mass. 79; Leary v. Boston & Albany R.R., 139 Mass. 580; Ballard v. New York etc. R.R., 126 Pa. 141; P. & R.R.R. Co. v. Hughes, 119 Pa. 301; Mensch v. R.R., 150 Pa. 598; Mixter v. Imperial Coal Co., 152 Pa. 397. A. G. Miller and......
-
Cunningham v. Frey
...et ux. v. Lebanon City, 149 Pa. 222; Ford v. Anderson, 139 Pa. 261; Simpson v. Pittsburg Locomotive Works, 139 Pa. 245; Ballard v. N. Y. C., etc., R. R. Co., 126 Pa. 141; Erie & W. V. R. Co. v. Smith, 125 Pa. 259; Kepner v. Harrisburg Traction Co., 183 Pa. 24; Philadelphia & Reading R. R. C......
-
Coll v. Easton Transit Co.
...the case should not be submitted to the jury: Phila. & R.R. v. Yeager, 73 Pa. 125; Phila. & R.R. v. Heil, 5 W.N.C. 61; Ballard v. N.Y., etc., R.R., 126 Pa. 141; Chilton v. Central Traction Co., 152 Pa. Flanagan v. People's Pass. Ry., 163 Pa. 103; Fleishman v. Neversink Mt. R.R., 174 Pa. 510......
-
First Presbyterian Congregation of Easton v. Smith
...had moved for a compulsory nonsuit because there was no proof of negligence, the authorities would have justified such action: Ballard v. R.R., 126 Pa. 141; Huey v. Gahlenbeck, 121 Pa. Defendants were not required to use the best methods known to the scientific would; the measure of their r......