Ballard v. State
Decision Date | 10 June 1932 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 4. |
Citation | 142 So. 668,225 Ala. 202 |
Parties | BALLARD v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Butler County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.
Dove alias Dovie, Ballard was convicted of murder in the first degree, and he appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Calvin Poole and D. M. Powell, both of Greenville, for appellant.
Thos E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
With reference to the juror Black, the record shows that he
We think that this circumstance was prima facie an indication of a favorable consideration from the standpoint of the state. We cannot disregard what all people understand. It meant something. It occurred during a most solemn judicial proceeding, which was no occasion for such conduct. The meaning which one would naturally attribute to the gesture was that, if the solicitor shall accept him as a juror, it will not be a mistake. It indicated a condition which suggested further inquiry by the court to determine if such meaning was not intended. We cannot approve anything which thus tends to reflect upon the complete freedom from bias which should be present in the minds of all jurors. In this respect we are constrained to declare reversible error.
Early Crenshaw, the courthouse janitor, accompanied the sheriff to Marshall, Mich., to bring the defendant back. He was in jail in Marshall. Defendant was brought back in a car with the sheriff and Early. He made a statement to Early when no one else was present. He says it was in Tennessee at a time when Mr. Canant, the sheriff, got out of the car and went into a drug store. Thereupon the court ruled that the statement made by defendant to Early Crenshaw was inadmissible on account of the hope which was then expressed to him by Crenshaw.
Upon his return to Alabama, the sheriff at first left defendant at Camp Kilby. This was November 18th. He went back for him the following day, November 19th, and brought him to Greenville. He was accompanied by D. E. Melton, the night marshal at Chapman.
Melton testified that he did not know what he said to get him to make a statement. He did not believe he said anything to defendant about the punishment he would probably get, and did not believe he mentioned the punishment. The sheriff said nothing about it. They brought the subject up with him. Defendant was handcuffed, and Melton and the sheriff were both armed. Without telling him his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arant v. State
... ... We need not, ... therefore, stop to inquire as to the correctness of the few ... charges refused defendant, for the reason that in any event ... their substance was embraced in the instructions to the jury, ... as above indicated. Deloney v. State, 225 Ala. 65, ... 142 So. 432; Ballard v. State, 225 Ala. 202, 142 So ... We have ... here considered those questions presented by the record which ... we thought worthy of separate treatment, but, mindful of our ... duty in such matters, we have carefully reviewed the entire ... record, and find no error to reverse ... ...
-
Allen v. State
...had the appearance (to accused) of having the ability to perform the janitor's promise of a benefit to the accused. Ballard v. State, 225 Ala. 202, 142 So. 668, syl 3 (the report of case does not show what the janitor The accused, in answer to a question of counsel for State, 'You know that......
-
Edwards v. State
... ... doubt on this point is resolved in favor of the accused. Vol ... 22, Corpus Juris Secundum, Criminal Law, § 835, p. 1460; ... Wharton's Criminal Evidence, Vol. 2, Sec. 601, p. 998; ... Underhill [194 Md. 401] On Criminal Evidence, Sec. 266, p ... 521; Redd v. State, 69 Ala. 255; Ballard v ... State, 225 Ala. 202, 142 So. 668; Andrews v ... People, 33 Colo. 193, 79 P. 1031, 108 Am.St.Rep. 76; ... State v. Fisher, 51 N.C. 478; State v ... Howard, 17 N.H. 171; Coffee v. State, 25 Fla ... 501, 6 So. 493, 23 Am.St.Rep. 525; Whitten v. State, ... 86 Fla. 111, 97 So. 496; ... ...
-
Bell v. State
...Section 6670, Code; rule 22, Circuit Court Practice; Roan v. State, 225 Ala. 428, 143 So. 454, and authorities cited; Ballard v. State, 225 Ala. 202, 142 So. 668. however, the matter complained of as occurring at the café while the jury were at dinner and during the trial, we observe that t......