Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.

Decision Date24 August 1995
Citation321 Or. 511,900 P.2d 508
PartiesSigitas BANAITIS, Respondent on Review, v. MITSUBISHI BANK, LTD., and Bank of California, N.A., Petitioners on Review, and Karen LESH, Defendant. CC A8912-07357; CA A70113; SC S41684.
CourtOregon Supreme Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.

VAN HOOMISSEN and DURHAM, JJ., would not dismiss.

* Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Stephen L. Gallagher, Jr., Judge. 129 Or.App. 371, 879 P.2d 1288 (1994).

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • PAUL v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM-Or.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • October 6, 2010
    ...distinguished our earlier decision in Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd., 129 Or.App. 371, 879 P.2d 1288 (1994), rev. dismissed, 321 Or. 511, 900 P.2d 508 (1995). Similar to this case, in Banaitis, there were federal and state statutes protecting the information at issue from disclosure, for......
  • Love v. Polk County Fire District
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • December 6, 2006
    ...320 Cr. 749, 891 P.2d 659 (1995), Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd., 129 Or.App. 371, 879 P.2d 1288 (1994), rev. dismissed, 321 Or. 511, 900 P.2d 508 (1995), and the Supreme Court's opinion in Babick address the identification of an "important public duty." In Anderson, we held that such a ......
  • Stevens v. First Interstate Bank
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • May 17, 2000
    ...argue, nevertheless, that Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd., 129 Or.App. 371, 377-78, 879 P.2d 1288 (1994), rev. dismissed 321 Or. 511, 900 P.2d 508 (1995), recognizes—and, indeed, is premised on—a distinct, legally enforceable obligation to protect bank customer information. Plaintiffs' re......
  • Dunwoody v. Handskill Corp.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • January 8, 2003
    ...this and other jurisdictions. Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd., 129 Or.App. 371, 377-78, 879 P.2d 1288 (1993), rev. dismissed, 321 Or. 511, 900 P.2d 508 (1995). Following that methodology, Oregon courts have sustained claims for wrongful discharge in which the plaintiffs were terminated fo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT