Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kansas, Inc., s. 95-3385
Decision Date | 18 December 1996 |
Docket Number | 95-3396,Nos. 95-3385,s. 95-3385 |
Citation | 103 F.3d 80 |
Parties | BANCAMERICA COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation; ASARCO, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. MOSHER STEEL OF KANSAS, INC., a Kansas corporation; Trinity Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Before PORFILIO, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
On November 13, 1996, we issued an opinion in these cases affirming the judgment of the district court, with the exception of reversing and remanding for the granting of prejudgment interest to Plaintiffs in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) (1994). 100 F.3d 792 (10th Cir.1996).
Our opinion, contrary to the prescription of Fed. R.App. P. 37, contained no instructions to the district court concerning the award of postjudgment interest. Consequently, Plaintiffs Bancamerica Commercial Corp. and ASARCO, Inc. moved that we reform the mandate to indicate interest should be awarded from the date of the district court's original judgment. We agree that interest should accrue on the entire judgment, including the forthcoming award of prejudgment interest, from August 2, 1995, the date of the district court's original judgment, and amend our mandate accordingly.
Postjudgment interest from the entry of the district court's judgment is mandatory. 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) (1994). Rule 37 provides further guidance: "If a judgment is modified or reversed with a direction that a judgment for money be entered in the district court, the mandate shall contain instructions with respect to allowance of interest." Failing to previously supply such instructions, we now repair our error. 1
In determining whether postjudgment interest should accrue from the date of the district court's original judgment or the date of a later judgment, we examine "the extent to which the case was reversed." Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Hegler, 818 F.2d 730, 737 (10th Cir.1987), cert. dismissed, 486 U.S. 1063, 109 S.Ct. 7, 100 L.Ed.2d 937 & 487 U.S. 1265, 109 S.Ct. 28, 101 L.Ed.2d 978 (1988). Where the original judgment lacks an evidentiary or legal basis, postjudgment interest accrues from the date of the second trial court judgment, see Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. Bonjorno, 494 U.S. 827, 835-36, 110 S.Ct. 1570, 1575-76, 108 L.Ed.2d 842 (1990); "where the original judgment is basically sound but is modified on remand, post-judgment interest accrues from the date of the first judgment." Cordero v. De Jesus-Mendez, 922 F.2d 11, 16 (1st Cir.1990); see also, e.g., Dunn v. HOVIC, 13 F.3d 58 (3d Cir.1993) ( ); Coal Resources, Inc. v. Gulf & W. Indus., 954 F.2d 1263, 1273-75 (6th Cir.1992) ( ).
Here, our reversal was limited to the district court's failure to grant Plaintiffs prejudgment interest, whereas we affirmed all other aspects of the district court's lengthy decision. As in Northern Natural Gas, "reversal for such a purpose was not to a large 'extent' or an extent sufficient to change the determinative judgment for ... purposes [of the commencement of accrual of postjudgment interest]." 818 F.2d at 738. Accordingly, postjudgment interest should accrue from August 2, 1995, the date of the district court's original judgment.
Moreover, the monetary award upon which postjudgment interest should accrue is the entire award granted by the district court, including the forthcoming award of prejudgment interest. That is the dollar figure to which Plaintiffs justly became entitled on August 2, 1995, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Township of Brighton
... ... that its agreement did not allow commercial or industrial waste, though as with waste from ... Life Ins. Co. v. Atlantic Research Corp., 847 F.Supp. 389, 395-96 (E.D.Va.1994) ("That ... See, e.g., Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland Apartments, 94 F.3d 1489 (11th ... See Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel, 100 F.3d 792, ... ...
-
Town of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical Corp.
... ... Corporation, Great American Industries, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PLC Enterprises, ... was unlined, accepted residential and commercial waste, including cesspool waste, as well as ... -in-interest to Cerro, which manufactured steel electrical conduit, hot rolled copper rod, and ... ; New Castle County, 111 F.3d 1116; Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kansas, 100 ... ...
-
Camacho v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
... ... Durango Steakhouse of Brandon, Inc. , 267 F.3d 1183, 1186 (11th Cir.2001) ... v. Dravo Corp. , 678 F.2d 942, 945 (11th Cir.1982) ; 28 U.S.C ... 1017, 1031 (4th Cir.1993) (en banc); Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kans., Inc ... ...
-
Caffey v. Unum Life Ins. Co.
... ... analyst for the Mansur Financial Group, Inc. ("Mansur") from September 11, 1989, until June ... Equicor-Equitable HCA Corp"., 944 F.2d 1272, 1276 (6th Cir.1991) ... \xC2" ... 1017, 1031 (4th Cir.1993) (en banc); Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kans., Inc., ... ...
-
Private Antitrust Suits
...in the district court, where such judgment is ‘modified or reversed.’” Id. at 709-10. 313. Bancamerica Commer. Corp. v. Mosher Steel, 103 F.3d 80, 81 (10th Cir. 1996) (quoting Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Hegler, 818 F.2d 730, 737 (10th Cir. 1987) ). 314. Id. (collecting cases); see also Kai......