Bank of America Corp. v. Edwards
Decision Date | 22 August 2003 |
Citation | 881 So.2d 403 |
Parties | BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION v. Addie L. EDWARDS. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
James C. Huckaby, Jr., John W. Scott, and L. Jackson Young, Jr., of Huckaby Scott & Dukes, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant.
John W. Parker, Mobile, for appellee.
Bank of America Corporation appeals from the Mobile Circuit Court's refusal to set aside a default judgment. We reverse and remand.
On July 25, 2001, Addie L. Edwards sued several defendants in the Mobile Circuit Court; one of those defendants was Bank of America Corporation. Because Bank of America is a foreign corporation, Edwards served the corporation by certified mail at the following address: 225 East John Carpenter Freeway, Irving, Texas 75062. Bank of America filed nothing in response, and on October 1, 2001, the Mobile Circuit Court entered a default judgment against Bank of America and awarded Edwards $85,000.
While researching an unrelated legal matter in Alabama, counsel for Bank of America discovered the default judgment. On December 3, 2001, Bank of America moved the Mobile Circuit Court to vacate the default judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P.1 Specifically, Bank of America argued that the trial court's judgment was void because, it argued, the trial court lacked jurisdiction over Bank of America. Bank of America alleged that the Irving, Texas, address to which the summons and complaint were sent was not Bank of America's usual place of business; instead, Bank of America alleged that its usual place of business was at 100 North Tyron Street, Charlotte, North Carolina. Bank of America further averred that the Irving, Texas, address was the usual place of business for one of its subsidiaries, NationsCredit Financial Services Corporation ("NationsCredit").
On February 5, 2002, the Mobile Circuit Court denied Bank of America's motion to vacate the default judgment. Bank of America moved the court to reconsider its judgment, and on March 27, 2002, the court denied the motion and certified its order as final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P. Bank of America appeals.
We review de novo a trial court's ruling on a Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion. See Northbrook Indem. Co. v. Westgate, Ltd., 769 So.2d 890, 893 (Ala.2000).
Image Auto, Inc. v. Mike Kelley Enters., Inc., 823 So.2d 655, 657 (Ala.2001).
Bank of America contends that the trial court should have granted its Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion because, it argues, Bank of America was never properly served pursuant to Rule 4(c)(6), Ala. R. Civ. P. Because it was never properly served, Bank of America's argument continues, the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter the default judgment against the corporation, thus rendering the judgment void. We agree.
Horizons 2000, Inc. v. Smith, 620 So.2d 606, 607 (Ala.1993).
Rule 4(c), Ala. R. Civ. P., governs service of process on a corporation:
"`Failure of proper service under Rule 4 [Ala. R. Civ. P.] deprives a court of jurisdiction and renders its judgment void.'" Northbrook Indem. Co. v. Westgate, Ltd., 769 So.2d at 893 (quoting Ex parte Pate, 673 So.2d 427, 428-29 (Ala.1995)).
In support of its motion to vacate the default judgment, Bank of America submitted an affidavit of Lloyd H. Harrison, Jr., assistant vice president of Bank of America. Harrison averred that the Irving, Texas, address to which Edwards sent her complaint was not a usual place of business for Bank of America; instead, according to Harrison, the Irving, Texas, address is the usual place of business for NationsCredit, a subsidiary of Bank of America. Harrison stated that Bank of America's usual place of business is located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Furthermore, Harrison testified that NationsCredit is not an authorized agent to receive service of process for Bank of America.
On appeal, Edwards responds to Harrison's testimony by asserting that "it is clear that the 225 East John Carpenter Freeway, Irving, Texas address was a usual place of business of Bank of America, a foreign corporation, and as Rule 4(c)(6) allows service at any of its usual places of business, service pursuant to that Rule is effective in this cause." (Edwards's brief at 6.) Apparently, Edwards assumes that service upon a subsidiary of Bank of America, without more, is sufficient to constitute service upon Bank of America. Our caselaw, however, holds otherwise.
Ex parte Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 443 So.2d 880, 884 (Ala.1983).
This Court has discussed some of the factors to be considered in determining the extent of a parent company's control and domination over a subsidiary.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Facebook, Inc. v. K.G.S.
...judgment rendered against a defendant in the absence of personal jurisdiction over that defendant is void.’ " Bank of America Corp. v. Edwards, 881 So. 2d 403, 405 (Ala. 2003) (quoting Horizons 2000, Inc. v. Smith, 620 So. 2d 606, 607 (Ala. 1993) ). Because the trial court did not have juri......
-
D.B. v. D.G.
...(quoting Dennis v. Still Waters Residential Ass'n, 18 So.3d 959, 961 (Ala.Civ.App.2009), quoting in turn Bank of America Corp. v. Edwards, 881 So.2d 403, 405 (Ala.2003), quoting in turn Horizons 2000, Inc. v. Smith, 620 So.2d 606, 607 (Ala.1993), quoting in turn Ex parte Volkswagenwerk Akti......
-
Looney v. State
...of the subject matter or of the parties, or if it acted in a manner inconsistent with due process.” ’ ”Bank of America Corp. v. Edwards, 881 So.2d 403, 405 (Ala.2003) (quoting Image Auto, Inc. v. Mike Kelley Enters., Inc., 823 So.2d 655, 657 (Ala.2001), quoting in turn Insurance Mgmt. & Adm......
-
Emergency Response Specialists, Inc. v. Csa Ocean Scis., Inc., Case No. 2:14-cv-02214-WMA
...such control and domination over the subsidiary that it operates merely as a department of the parent corporation. Bank of America Corp. v. Edwards, 881 So.2d 403 (Ala. 2003); see In re Curenton, 205 B.R. 967 (Bankr. M.D.Ala. 1995). ERS has made no such ...