Bank of Hampton v. Wright
Decision Date | 07 October 1929 |
Docket Number | No. 8318.,8318. |
Citation | 35 F.2d 321 |
Parties | BANK OF HAMPTON v. WRIGHT. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
J. W. Warren, of Camden, Ark., for appellant.
Silas W. Rogers, of El Dorado, Ark., and C. E. Wright, of Magnolia, Ark., for appellee.
Before VAN VALKENBURGH and COTTERAL, Circuit Judges, and SCOTT, District Judge.
The appellant complains of the disallowance in bankruptcy of a secured claim, consisting of a note and a mortgage on a lot in Hampton, Ark., which were presented to the referee for the stated purpose of an offer to accept a conveyance of the lot in discharge of the debt. The mortgage was filed for record on April 25, 1927, in Calhoun county, Arkansas, where the lot was situated, and, while it does not appear, we assume this antedated the bankruptcy petition more than four months.
The trustee refused the offer and applied for a sale of the property free of liens, because of an alleged equity above the mortgage, which by a response the appellant denied. Later the trustee objected to the claim on the grounds that the mortgage was not authorized by the bankrupt corporation, was made only by individuals, and the acknowledgment of the instrument was defective, and hence it was not entitled to be recorded and did not effect notice to creditors. On a hearing of the objections, the referee disallowed the claim as a security, holding the mortgage was not signed or sealed by the bankrupt corporation, and was not made or acknowledged in its name. The District Judge affirmed that order on review, and the bank appeals.
The mortgage recites that it is made by C. I. Abbott, president, and W. R. Reddin, secretary, of the Abbott Company, and bears only the signatures of those officers, with the word "Seal" opposite each name, The acknowledgment indorsed on the instrument is as follows:
Section 1521, C. & M. Dig. Stat. of Arkansas, provides:
"The acknowledgment of deeds and instruments of writing for the conveyance of real estate, or whereby such real estate is to be affected in law or equity, shall be by the grantor appearing in person before such court or officer having the authority by law to take such acknowledgment, and stating that he had executed the same for the consideration and purposes therein mentioned and set forth."
Section 1526 of said Digest, prescribes the form of a corporate acknowledgment in these terms:
Section 7381 of the Digest reads as follows:
"Every mortgage, whether for real or personal property, shall be a lien on the mortgaged property from the time the same is filed in the recorder's office for record, and not before; which filing shall be notice to all persons of the existence of such mortgage."
The District Judge, after quoting from the case of O'Neill v. Lyric Amusement Co., 119 Ark. 454, 178 S. W. 406, and noticing the title of a trustee in bankruptcy, held as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Stewart
...will be sufficient if it substantially complies with the Arkansas statutes. In re Bearhouse, 99 B.R. at 927 (citing Bank of Hampton v. Wright, 35 F.2d 321, 322 (8th Cir.1929)). Courts will sustain a certificate of acknowledgment whenever it is possible to do so. 1 Am. Jur.2d Acknowledgments......
-
In re Bearhouse, Inc.
...of the instrument, either by reference to the acknowledgment alone or to the instrument as a whole. See, e.g., Bank of Hampton v. Wright, 35 F.2d 321, 322-23 (8th Cir.1929) (acknowledgment of mortgage omitted fact of authorization by corporation); Cumberland Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Sparks, 11......
- Callaway v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.