Bank Of Sparta v. Butts

Decision Date09 May 1907
Docket Number(No. 310.)
CitationBank Of Sparta v. Butts, 1 Ga.App. 771, 57 S.E. 1061 (Ga. App. 1907)
PartiesBANK OF SPARTA v. BUTTS.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
1. Trover—Petition—Sufficiency.

A petition in an action of trover, which sets out a description of the property and its value, title thereto in the plaintiff, possession in the defendant, and a refusal to deliver on demand, is good against general demurrer. Phelan v. Vestner, 54 S. E. 097, 125 Ga. 825.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 47, Trover and Conversion, § 191.]

2. Same—Demurrer.

The defendant cannot, by special demurrer, compel the plaintiff to disclose the evidence by which he proposes to prove title.

3. Same—Title.

In such a petition an allegation that a named third person delivered the property to the defendant does not tend to deny the plaintiff's title, but merely aids the description of the property. Phelan v. Vestner, supra.

4. Same—Demurrers.

The court erred in sustaining the demurrers, general and special.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from City Court of Sparta; Little, Judge.

Action by the Bank of Sparta against D. L. Butts. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed.

The petition alleged: "(1) That D. L. Butts, of said county, is in possession of certain personal property, to wit, five bales of cotton, which were delivered to said D. L. Butts during the month of November, 1904, by W. W. Devereaux, for which the said D. L. Butts executed his warehouse receipts to the said W. W. Devereaux. The two bales marked 'W. D., Nos. 1 and 2, weights 406 and 497, were delivered to said D. L. Butts on November 13, 1904. One bale, marked 'W. D., ' No. 3, weight 519, was delivered to said D. L. Butts on November 17, 1904. One bale marked 'W. D., ' No. 4, weight 502, was delivered to said D. L. Butts, on November 18, 1904. One bale marked 'W. D., ' No. 5, weight 517, was delivered to said D. L. Butts on November 19, 1904. All of the value of two hundred ninety-seven and 61/100 dollars ($297.61), to which above-described cotton your petitioner claims title. (2) That although your petitioner has offered to pay and tendered the said D. L. Butts the customary charges for insurance and storage on said cotton on the receipt or delivery of said cotton to the order of your petitioner, which the said D. L. Butts has agreed to do, yet the said D. L. Butts refuses to deliver the above-described property to your petitioner." The defendant filed the following demurrer: "(1) No legal or equitable cause of action is set forth in plaintiff's petition. (2) Paragraph 1 of the petition fails to show by proper allegations how the title to the cotton sued for got out of W. W. Devereaux and vested in the plaintiff. If the plaintiff, in paragraph 1, means to say that the title to the cotton sued for passed out of W. W. Devereaux into the plaintiff by an assignment of warehouse receipts issued by the defendant, a...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Ayers v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1907
    ...definite allegation that it was the property seized under a certain levy sufficiently individualized the transaction. See Bank of Sparta v. Butts, 1 Ga. App. 771 3), 57 S. E. 1061; Phelan v. Vestner, 125 Ga. 826, 54 S. E. 697. By this additional identification of the subject-matter of the l......
  • Ayers v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1907
    ... ... sufficiently individualized the transaction. See Bank of ... Sparta v. Butts, 1 Ga.App. 771 (3), 57 S.E. 1061; ... Phelan v. Vestner, 125 Ga. 826, 54 ... ...
  • Hudgins & Co. v. Southland Ice Co., 38931
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 28, 1961
    ...defendant to deliver it to the plaintiff on demand. Such allegations are sufficient as against a general demurrer. Bank of Sparta v. Butts, 1 Ga.App. 771(1), 57 S.E. 1061. 2. The items sued for in the petition were: 'A 50-ton ice freezing tank, a complete coil assembly with connections to l......
  • Bank of Sparta v. Butts
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 1908
  • Get Started for Free