Bank of Westfield v. Inman

Decision Date01 January 1893
Docket Number855
Citation34 N.E. 670,8 Ind.App. 239
PartiesTHE BANK OF WESTFIELD v. INMAN ET AL
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

8 Ind.App. 239. At 245.

Original Opinion of May 13, 1893, Reported at: 8 Ind.App. 239.

Petition for rehearing overruled.

OPINION

ON PETITION FOR A REHEARING.

PER CURIAM.

It is settled by a long line of decisions that a rehearing will not be granted to enable the parties to procure a correction of the record. Warner v. Campbell, 39 Ind. 409; Pittsburgh, etc., R. R. Co. v. Van Houten, 48 Ind. 90; Cole v. Allen, 51 Ind. 122; State, ex rel.,v. Terre Haute, etc., R. R. Co., 64 Ind. 297 (303); Board, etc., v. Hall, 70 Ind. 469 (476); Mansur v. Churchman, 84 Ind. 573; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 (179); State v. Dixon, 97 Ind. 125 (126); Board, etc., v. Center Tp., 105 Ind. 422, 2 N.E. 368 (444); Elliott's App. Proced., section 556.

By section 3 of the act of February 16, 1893, Acts of 1893, p. 31, it is expressly provided that this court shall be governed in all things by the law as declared by the Supreme Court, and shall not, directly or by implication, reverse or modify any decision of that court.

Petition for rehearing overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT