Bankers Fidelity Life Ins. Co. v. Perkins

• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
• Writing for the Court: CUSTER; CARLISLE, P. J., and EBERHARDT
• Citation: Bankers Fidelity Life Ins. Co. v. Perkins, 123 S.E.2d 440, 104 Ga.App. 902 (Ga. App. 1961)
• Decision Date: 17 November 1961
• Docket Number: 39214,39209,39216,No. 3,39210,39207,39208,Nos. 39206,39212,s. 39206,3
• Parties: BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. A. T. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. F. B. NEWTON, Sr. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Anna C. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Elsie B. ARMSTRONG. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Alma K. OLIVER. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Leila G. SANDERS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. J. MILLER III, Executor. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Gussie V. NEWTON

Page 440

123 S.E.2d 440

104 Ga.App. 902

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. A. T. PERKINS.

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. F. B. NEWTON, Sr.

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Anna C. PERKINS.

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Elsie B. ARMSTRONG.

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Alma K. OLIVER.

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Leila G. SANDERS.

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. J. MILLER III, Executor.

BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Gussie V. NEWTON.

Nos. 39206, 39212, 39214, 39216, 39207, 39208, 39209, 39210.

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 3.

Nov. 17, 1961.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1961.

Error from Superior Court, Screven County; Walton Usher, Judge.

Sam F. Lowe, Jr., Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

Hilton & Hilton, L. H. Hilton, Sylvania, for defendants in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

CUSTER, Judge.

The foregoing cases being controlled by Bankers Fidelity Life Ins. Co. v. Harrison, Ga.App., 123 S.E.2d 438, the judgment of the trial court overruling the first two grounds of demurrer to the petition, and sustaining certain grounds of demurrer to the answer, is affirmed. The judgment overruling the third ground of demurrer to the petition is reversed, and the fourth and fifth grounds of demurrer to the petition are not passed upon

...