Banks v. Maxwell, 131.
Citation | 171 S.E. 70,205 N. C. 233 |
Decision Date | 11 October 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 131.,131. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
Parties | BANKS . v. MAXWELL. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Henderson County; P. A. McElroy, Judge.
Action by Joseph Arthur Banks against James A. Maxwell. Judgment of nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for serious injuries sustained by being gored by a bull owned by the defendant. The plaintiff was a boy 18 years of age, and had been raised on a farm, and on July 10, 1931, was working on the farm of defendant
The narrative of the injury is substantially as follows:
Another witness for plaintiff said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alexander v. Crotchett
...377; McIntire v. Prater, 189 Ark. 596, 74 S.W.2d 639; Creeger v. Springfield Rendering Co., 220 N.E. 352; Banks v. Maxwell, 171 S.W. 70, 205 N.C. 233. (2) The Kansas Stock Yards Company was not required to discover by inquiry or otherwise that the bull was vicious nor was it required to exe......
-
Alexander v. Crochett
...McIntire v. Prater, 189 Ark. 596, 74 S.W. (2d) 639; Creeger v. Springfield Rendering Co., 220 N.E. 352; Banks v. Maxwell, 171 S.W. 70, 205 N.C. 233. (2) The Kansas City Stock Yards Company was not required to discover by inquiry or otherwise that the bull was vicious nor was it required to ......
-
Plumidies v. Smith, 527.
...should have known of the animal's vicious propensity, character and habits. Hill v. Moseley, 220 N.C. 485, 17 S.E.2d 676; Banks v. Maxwell, 205 N.C. 233, 171 S.E. 70; Rector v. Southern Coal Co, 192 N.C. 804, 136 S.E. 113; State v. Smith, 156 N.C. 628, 72 S.E. 321, 36 L.R.A, N.S, 910; Hally......
-
First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of Columbia v. Page
... ... the principle announced in Mercer v. Bullock, 191 ... N.C. 216, 131 S.E. 580, that the purchaser is entitled to all ... rents falling due after the foreclosure, ... ...