Banowsky v. Guy Backstrom, 96200-6

Decision Date28 November 2018
Docket NumberNo. 96200-6,96200-6
Citation430 P.3d 255 (Table)
Parties Teresa BANOWSKY, Petitioner, v. GUY BACKSTROM, D.C., d/b/a Bear Creek Chiropractic Center, Respondent.
CourtWashington Supreme Court
ORDER

Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

IT IS ORDERED:

That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Banowsky v. Backstrom
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • July 25, 2019
    ...421 P.3d 1030. Thus, the Court of Appeals adopted Backstrom’s interpretation of the rule. ¶16 We granted review. Banowsky v. Backstrom, 192 Wash.2d 1001, 430 P.3d 255 (2018).II. DISCUSSIONA. Standard of Review ¶17 This case involves issues of subject matter jurisdiction, rule interpretation......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT